Batchelor v Marlow [2003] 1 WLR 764

Facts

  • Mr. Batchelor claimed an easement to park six cars on land owned by Mr. Marlow.
  • The right was based on a document allowing parking during business hours, six days a week.
  • The dispute centered around whether this easement prevented Mr. Marlow, the servient owner, from using or managing his land, potentially invalidating the easement.

Issues

  1. Whether the claimed easement for parking gave Mr. Batchelor exclusive control over the land, thus invalidating it as an easement.
  2. Whether the servient owner, Mr. Marlow, retained any practical use of his land under the terms of the parking right.
  3. Whether the reasonable use test and the ouster principle should be applied to determine the validity of the claimed easement.

Decision

  • The Court of Appeal held that the easement claimed was too extensive and effectively excluded Mr. Marlow from practical use of his land.
  • The court applied the "reasonable use" test, finding that Mr. Marlow’s inability to use the land meant the right claimed could not be an easement.
  • The ruling emphasized that an easement must not confer exclusive possession or control of the servient land to the dominant owner.
  • Mr. Batchelor's claim was rejected as it would have granted him excessive control, contrary to the nature of an easement.

Legal Principles

  • An easement cannot grant exclusive control or possession; the servient owner must retain some practical use of the land.
  • The "reasonable use" test evaluates whether the servient owner is left with any real use, not just theoretical or trivial use, of the land.
  • The ouster principle prohibits an easement that effectively transfers full authority or ownership-like rights to the dominant tenement.
  • Application of the reasonable use test depends on factors such as land size, use frequency, duration, and purpose.
  • Batchelor v Marlow distinguished between acceptable easements, as in Wright v Macadam [1949] 2 KB 744, and those granting excessive exclusivity.

Conclusion

The Court of Appeal in Batchelor v Marlow established that an easement must not confer exclusive control over servient land by applying the reasonable use test rooted in the ouster principle; this decision clarified the legal boundaries for parking easements and remains influential in later property law cases.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal