BBMB Finance (Hong Kong) Ltd v Eda Holdings Ltd [1990] 1 WLR 409

Facts

  • BBMB Finance (Hong Kong) Ltd, a financial institution, and Eda Holdings Ltd, a corporate entity, entered into a contract for the provision of foreign exchange services.
  • The contract stipulated specific terms regarding exchange rates and timelines for transactions.
  • Eda Holdings Ltd failed to fulfill its contractual obligations, resulting in claimed financial losses to BBMB Finance.
  • The matter was brought before the Court of Appeal, with the dispute focusing on how to assess damages arising from the breach of contract, specifically in the context of fluctuating foreign exchange markets.

Issues

  1. Whether damages for breach of a foreign exchange contract should be assessed by incorporating the impact of market fluctuations.
  2. Whether currency fluctuations are a foreseeable risk that must be considered in the quantification of damages arising from the breach.

Decision

  • The Court of Appeal held that the assessment of damages must account for real-world economic conditions, including market volatility in foreign exchange rates.
  • It was determined that market fluctuations are a foreseeable risk in international financial transactions.
  • The court endorsed a methodical approach to quantifying damages, requiring reference to objective financial data, such as historical exchange rates and prevailing market trends at the time of breach.
  • Expert testimony may be necessary to accurately assess the financial impact of breaches in such contexts.

Legal Principles

  • Damages for breach of contract should reflect the actual financial impact experienced by the plaintiff and consider relevant factors such as market conditions.
  • Market fluctuations in foreign exchange are a normal and foreseeable risk for parties in such contracts, and should be factored into damages assessments.
  • Contracts involving foreign exchange should include clear terms addressing the allocation of risk associated with market volatility.
  • The foreseeability of damages and the duty to mitigate losses are guiding principles when quantifying losses in volatile markets.

Conclusion

The Court of Appeal in BBMB Finance (Hong Kong) Ltd v Eda Holdings Ltd confirmed that damages for breach of foreign exchange contracts must reflect actual financial losses, taking into account foreseeable market fluctuations, thus setting a precedent for future financial disputes involving volatile markets.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal