Blake v Galloway [2004] 1 WLR 2844

Facts

  • The case involved a group of teenagers engaged in consensual horseplay, during which one participant threw a piece of bark at another, causing injury.
  • The claimant alleged that the act constituted battery.
  • The defendant argued that the injury occurred within the context of mutual horseplay and implied consent.
  • The participants were engaged in informal, non-hostile interactions typical of rough or boisterous play.

Issues

  1. Whether participation in consensual horseplay could negate liability for battery under UK law.
  2. Whether the specific act of throwing the bark exceeded the scope of consent and thus gave rise to a battery claim.
  3. How the boundaries of consent are determined in the context of informal, playful activities.

Decision

  • The Court of Appeal held that the claimant had implicitly consented to the general nature of the horseplay.
  • The injury was seen as a built-in risk of the activity, and the defendant’s conduct did not exceed the reasonable scope of the consented behavior.
  • The act of throwing the bark was not considered so far outside the scope of the horseplay as to constitute battery.
  • As such, liability for battery was negated due to the defendant acting within the scope of mutual consent.

Legal Principles

  • Battery is the intentional and unlawful application of force to another person without lawful justification.
  • Consent is a defense to battery, but its scope depends on the context and reasonable expectations of the participants.
  • Horseplay generally involves mutual, non-hostile physical contact, and participants consent to a certain degree of risk.
  • Consent does not extend to conduct that is unforeseeable or exceeds what is reasonably acceptable in the activity.
  • The assessment of whether conduct falls within the scope of consent must consider the context and nature of the interaction.

Conclusion

The Court of Appeal in Blake v Galloway clarified that mutual participation in horseplay typically implies consent, negating liability for battery unless the defendant’s actions go beyond the reasonable scope of that consent.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal