Innes v Wylie (1844) 1 Car & Kir 257

Facts

  • The plaintiff, Innes, claimed that the defendant, Wylie, committed battery by standing in a doorway and thereby obstructing Innes from entering a room.
  • Innes argued that Wylie's obstruction amounted to an unlawful application of force.
  • The court determined that Wylie's act was limited to standing still and did not involve any direct active interference or affirmative movement.
  • The judgment emphasized the absence of any affirmative, voluntary act by the defendant and characterized Wylie's conduct as passive obstruction without direct physical contact.

Issues

  1. Whether the defendant’s act of standing still and obstructing the plaintiff amounted to battery under tort law.
  2. Whether battery requires a positive, affirmative act as opposed to passive conduct.
  3. Whether passive obstruction without physical contact constitutes the intentional application of force necessary for battery.

Decision

  • The court held that battery requires a positive act by the defendant.
  • It found that merely standing in the way, without any affirmative action, does not amount to battery.
  • The judgment concluded that Wylie’s passive conduct did not satisfy the threshold for battery, as no direct, active interference occurred.
  • The plaintiff’s claim for battery was rejected on the basis that liability cannot be imposed for passive presence alone.

Legal Principles

  • Battery in tort law is defined as the intentional and direct application of force by a voluntary act of the defendant.
  • Liability for battery does not arise from mere inaction or passive conduct.
  • A positive, voluntary act is essential for establishing liability in battery cases.
  • The principle drawn from this case has been cited in subsequent authorities as establishing the requirement of an affirmative act for battery.

Conclusion

The court in Innes v Wylie established that liability for battery arises only where there is a positive, voluntary act; mere passive obstruction or standing still does not meet the threshold for actionable battery, thereby clarifying the boundaries of tortious liability for intentional interference.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal