R v Bollom [2003] EWCA Crim 2846

Facts

  • The defendant, Bollom, was convicted of causing grievous bodily harm (GBH) to his partner’s 17-month-old child.
  • The child sustained multiple bruises and marks on the body.
  • Individually, each injury may not have been classified as severe for an adult.
  • The Court of Appeal determined that the combined effect of the injuries, in light of the child’s age and fragility, satisfied the threshold for GBH.
  • The initial conviction was overturned due to the trial judge’s inadequate directions to the jury regarding the relevance of the victim’s age in assessing the seriousness of harm.

Issues

  1. Whether injuries that are not individually severe can amount to GBH when regarded in combination.
  2. Whether the victim’s age and health must be considered when determining if the injuries constitute GBH.
  3. Whether the jury requires explicit instruction on considering the victim's specific vulnerability in GBH assessments.

Decision

  • The Court of Appeal held that GBH must be assessed in relation to the particular victim, including their age and health.
  • Injuries that may be minor for a healthy adult could amount to GBH for a vulnerable person, such as a young child or elderly individual.
  • The assessment of harm must be based on the cumulative impact of all injuries, not just on each injury individually.
  • The failure of the trial judge to instruct the jury on the importance of the victim’s age required the initial conviction to be set aside.

Legal Principles

  • Grievous bodily harm is to be evaluated by considering the victim's circumstances, including age and health.
  • Combined effects of injuries are relevant in determining whether harm is sufficiently serious to qualify as GBH.
  • Legal protection is extended to vulnerable groups by recognising their increased susceptibility to harm.
  • Accurate jury instructions are essential regarding the relevance of victim characteristics in GBH determinations.

Conclusion

The decision in R v Bollom established that assessment of GBH must be individualized, factoring in the age and health of the victim and recognising that vulnerable individuals may suffer greater harm from injuries that might otherwise seem minor, thus shaping prosecutorial, defence, and judicial approach to such cases.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal