R v G and R [2003] UKHL 50

Facts

  • Two minors, G and R, caused serious property damage by setting a fire.
  • They were convicted of criminal damage under the Criminal Damage Act 1971.
  • The previous law, established by Caldwell, applied an objective test for recklessness, holding defendants liable even if they did not actually foresee the risk.
  • The House of Lords reviewed whether the objective or subjective standard for recklessness should apply.

Issues

  1. Whether the test for recklessness in criminal damage should be subjective (dependent on the defendant's actual awareness of risk) or objective (based on a reasonable person's viewpoint).
  2. Whether the Criminal Damage Act 1971 allows for an objective standard of recklessness.
  3. Whether it is fair to convict individuals who, due to youth or limited understanding, did not perceive a risk that a reasonable person would have noticed.

Decision

  • The House of Lords overturned the minors' convictions, holding that recklessness requires proof the defendant was actually aware of the risk.
  • The subjective standard for recklessness was restored, overruling the approach taken in Caldwell.
  • It was emphasised that criminal liability should generally depend on the defendant’s actual state of mind, not on whether a reasonable person would have foreseen the risk.
  • The wording of the Criminal Damage Act 1971 does not support an objective standard for recklessness.

Legal Principles

  • Recklessness in criminal damage under the Criminal Damage Act 1971 requires subjective awareness of risk.
  • Liability should be tied to the defendant’s actual knowledge and foresight, reaffirming individual responsibility in criminal law.
  • Objective standards of recklessness are inappropriate where the accused lacks the capacity to appreciate risks that others might discern.
  • The subjective test protects defendants, especially minors or those with limited understanding, from being unfairly convicted.

Conclusion

R v G and R restored the subjective test for recklessness in criminal damage, holding that liability depends on a defendant’s personal awareness of risk, and not on whether a reasonable person would have foreseen it, thereby supporting fairer outcomes, particularly for vulnerable defendants.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal