Rights, duties, and powers of shareholders

Can You Answer This?

Practice with real exam questions

Roxmon Ltd is a small manufacturing company with two major shareholders, Paige and Jonas. Paige holds 60% of the voting rights, Jonas holds 30%, and the remaining 10% belongs to several minority shareholders. Concerned about a proposed special resolution that would reduce the frequency of general meetings, Jonas acquires an additional 5% stake from a minority shareholder. Now holding 35%, Jonas fears Paige’s changes will weaken transparency and control. He hopes to leverage his increased stake to preserve robust governance mechanisms.


Which of the following is the single best statement regarding Jonas’s ability to stop Paige’s proposed special resolution under the Companies Act 2006?

Introduction

Shareholders are fundamental components of corporate structures, defined by specific legal provisions within the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) and outlined in companies' articles of association. They possess distinct rights, duties, and powers essential to corporate governance. These include the ability to influence company direction, safeguard their investments, and hold management accountable. Understanding these legal constructs is essential for comprehending the mechanisms of corporate control and the regulatory framework that governs company operations.

Shareholder Rights: The Basis of Corporate Influence

Central to shareholder influence are various rights that allow them to shape corporate outcomes and protect individual stakes within the company. This grounding in the Companies Act 2006 sets the stage for shareholder participation and regulatory oversight.

Voting Rights

Within the framework of corporate governance, voting rights are important. Just as citizens exercise their right to vote to influence government decisions, shareholders use their voting rights to shape corporate policies and governance. Under Section 284 of CA 2006, the "one share, one vote" principle applies to ordinary resolutions unless the company's articles specify otherwise.

  • Ordinary Resolutions: A simple majority (over 50%) is sufficient to pass resolutions such as appointing or removing directors (Section 168 CA 2006) and approving annual accounts.

  • Special Resolutions: Requiring a 75% majority, these may include altering the articles (Section 21 CA 2006) or changing the company name (Section 77 CA 2006).

While this process appears straightforward, the methods—like show of hands or poll voting—can significantly influence corporate decisions (Sections 288-300 CA 2006).

Dividend Rights

The right to dividends involves a shareholder's entitlement to profits, although it is not absolute. The process involves directors proposing a dividend, which shareholders must approve at a general meeting for final dividends; interim dividends are at the directors' discretion. According to Section 830 CA 2006, dividends can only be paid out of profits available for distribution.

Right to Information

Transparency is essential to effective governance. Shareholders are granted access to key company information, ensuring informed decision-making.

  • Financial Reports: Section 431 CA 2006 obligates companies to provide annual accounts and reports.

  • Register of Members: Section 116 CA 2006 facilitates inspection of the register of members, fundamental for transparency.

  • Directors' Service Contracts: Section 228 CA 2006 grants inspection rights for directors' service contracts.

Right to Call General Meetings

Section 303 CA 2006 grants shareholders holding at least 5% of voting rights the ability to demand a general meeting. This is an important tool for addressing urgent issues or initiating discussions on the company's direction.

Shareholder Duties: Balancing Rights with Responsibilities

Although shareholders are not typically fiduciaries, they have key obligations ensuring that their actions align with governance integrity and statutory expectations.

Duty to Comply with the Company’s Constitution

A shareholder's compliance with the company's articles of association, effecting a statutory contract under Section 33 CA 2006, is necessary. Responsibilities include:

  • Exercising rights in accordance with established procedures.

  • Respecting the authority vested in directors.

  • Fulfilling obligations set within the articles.

Just as players must follow the agreed-upon rules to ensure a fair game, shareholders are required to comply with the company's constitution to maintain orderly governance.

Duty of Good Faith

Particularly for controlling shareholders, courts may impose a duty to act in good faith, reinforcing ethical conduct, as demonstrated in Re Westbourne Galleries Ltd [1973] AC 360.

Disclosure Duties

In public companies, shareholders possessing 3% or more of voting rights must disclose their interests under the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules (DTR 5), ensuring market transparency and fairness.

Shareholder Powers: Mechanisms of Influence and Control

The powers granted to shareholders enable them to exert influence and ensure the proper functioning of the company’s governance framework.

Appointment and Removal of Directors

  • Appointment: Governed by the company's articles, with Model Article 17 allowing director appointments through ordinary resolutions.

  • Removal: Codified in Section 168 CA 2006, enabling removal by ordinary resolution with a requisite 28-day notice.

Altering the Company’s Constitution

  • Amending Articles: Special resolutions, as per Section 21 CA 2006, facilitate changes to the governing articles, effectively tailoring governance structures.

  • Entrenching Provisions: Through Section 22 CA 2006, provisions can be entrenched, giving them greater permanence.

Ratification of Directors' Actions

Section 239 CA 2006 authorizes the ratification of directors' actions, such as negligence, while restricting the concerned director’s voting rights—a procedural safeguard.

Derivative Actions

Shareholders can initiate derivative actions under Sections 260-264 CA 2006, bringing claims against directors on behalf of the company. Court permission is requisite, assessing claim significance and potential impact. For instance, if a director engages in fraudulent activity harming the company, shareholders may initiate a derivative action to seek redress on behalf of the company.

Remedies for Minority Shareholders: Protection Against Majority Oppression

Minority shareholders are afforded specific protections to ensure equitable treatment within corporate governance structures.

Unfair Prejudice Petition

Under Section 994 CA 2006, shareholders may address conduct perceived as unfairly prejudicial by filing court petitions. Remedies can include a share buyout or regulation of company operations. The case of O'Neill v Phillips [1999] 1 WLR 1092 highlights objective criteria essential for unfair prejudice proceedings.

Just and Equitable Winding Up

Section 122(1)(g) of the Insolvency Act 1986 allows minority shareholders to pursue winding up the company on "just and equitable" grounds, such as when trust within the company has disintegrated.

But what recourse do minority shareholders have when they face oppression from the majority? These statutory remedies serve as necessary tools to protect their interests and ensure fairness.

Conclusion

The complex framework of shareholders' rights, duties, and powers under the Companies Act 2006 is critical to corporate governance. For example, in a takeover scenario, shareholders might exercise their right to call a general meeting (Section 303 CA 2006) to discuss the proposed acquisition. They could use their voting rights to pass special resolutions amending the company's articles (Section 21 CA 2006). If directors are suspected of breaching their duties, shareholders may initiate derivative actions (Sections 260-264 CA 2006) to address the misconduct. These instances illustrate how legal provisions allow shareholders to influence corporate decisions, uphold governance standards, and ensure accountability within the company.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Barbri SQE
One-time Fee
$3,800-6,900
BPP SQE
One-time Fee
$5,400-8,200
College of Legal P...
One-time Fee
$2,300-9,100
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350
Law Training Centr...
One-time Fee
$500-6,200
QLTS SQE
One-time Fee
$2,500-3,800
University of Law...
One-time Fee
$6,200-22,400

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of December 2024. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

Practice. Learn. Excel.

Features designed to support your job and test preparation

Question Bank

Access 100,000+ questions that adapt to your performance level and learning style.

Performance Analytics

Track your progress across topics and identify knowledge gaps with comprehensive analytics and insights.

Multi-Assessment Support

Prepare for multiple exams simultaneously, from academic tests to professional certifications.

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal