Defences to money laundering offences

Can You Answer This?

Practice with real exam questions

Lisa is a senior accountant at Nova Solutions, a financial consultancy firm working with high-net-worth clients worldwide. She recently facilitated a wire transfer of £900,000 from a politically exposed individual in another jurisdiction known for financial secrecy. Although Lisa suspected the funds might originate from illicit activities, she proceeded without filing a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR). She believed the transaction fell under the adequate consideration defense because the value matched the client's contract for advisory services. Investigators later challenged her actions, alleging incomplete compliance with money laundering regulations.


Which defense is Lisa most likely to succeed with under the UK's money laundering framework?

Introduction

Money laundering involves the process of concealing or disguising the origins of proceeds generated by illicit activities, making them appear legitimate. The United Kingdom addresses this issue through comprehensive legislation, primarily the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2002) and the Money Laundering Regulations 2017. These laws establish offenses and outline defenses applicable in cases of alleged money laundering. Understanding the legal framework and the available defenses is essential for managing the complexities of financial crime law.

Legal Framework and Key Offenses

The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2002)

POCA 2002 serves as a fundamental part of the UK's efforts to deter money laundering. It defines primary offenses related to handling criminal property, which include:

  1. Concealing Criminal Property (Section 327): Actions such as hiding, disguising, converting, transferring, or removing criminal property from the jurisdiction.

  2. Arrangements (Section 328): Participation in agreements which aid the acquisition, retention, use, or control of criminal property by or on behalf of another person.

  3. Acquisition, Use, and Possession (Section 329): Acquiring, using, or possessing property knowing or suspecting it constitutes or represents proceeds of crime.

  4. Failure to Disclose (Sections 330-332): Obligations for individuals in the regulated sector to report knowledge or suspicion of money laundering.

The Money Laundering Regulations 2017

Complementing POCA 2002, the Money Laundering Regulations 2017 impose compliance requirements on certain businesses to prevent money laundering. Key obligations include:

  • Customer Due Diligence (CDD): Verifying clients' identities and assessing risks associated with business relationships.

  • Risk Assessment: Evaluating and documenting potential risks of money laundering and terrorist financing present in business operations.

  • Policies, Controls, and Procedures: Establishing internal systems and controls to reduce identified risks effectively.

  • Record Keeping: Maintaining detailed records of transactions, customer identification, and risk assessments.

  • Training: Providing staff with adequate training to recognize and handle activities related to money laundering.

Key Defences Against Money Laundering Charges

Authorized Disclosure: Reporting Suspicious Activities

Authorized disclosure, outlined in Section 338 of POCA 2002, offers a defense to individuals who report suspicious transactions to the National Crime Agency (NCA) via a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR). Similar to a health professional reporting a notifiable disease to protect public welfare, this mechanism enables professionals to avoid liability by proactively notifying authorities.

Essential Conditions:

  • Timing of Disclosure: The disclosure must be made before engaging in the prohibited act, or as soon as reasonably practicable afterwards, if there was a reasonable excuse for not disclosing earlier.

  • Content of SAR: The report should include all relevant information regarding the suspicious activity or transaction.

  • Consent: If disclosure is made before the act, consent from the NCA is required to proceed. The NCA has seven working days to respond. If no response is received, the reporter may proceed after the expiration of the notice period.

  • Moratorium Period: If consent is refused, a moratorium period of up to 31 days begins, during which the act must not be performed.

Example Scenario:

A solicitor is instructed to transfer a substantial sum from a client's offshore account to purchase property in the UK. Sensing irregularities, the solicitor submits a SAR to the NCA before completing the transaction. By making an authorized disclosure, the solicitor safeguards against potential charges related to money laundering.

Adequate Consideration: Fair Value Transactions

The defense of adequate consideration, specified in Section 329(2)(c) of POCA 2002, applies when an individual acquires property for its proper market value without knowledge or suspicion of its illicit origins. This defense recognizes that legitimate business transactions should not be penalized when conducted in good faith.

Key Factors:

  • Fair Market Value: The property must be obtained for a price reflecting its true value.

  • Lack of Suspicion: There should be no grounds to suspect that the property is criminally derived.

  • No Intent to Assist: The individual must not intend to aid any criminal conduct through the transaction.

Example Scenario:

An art dealer purchases a collection from a seller at fair market prices. Unbeknownst to the dealer, the seller's funds are proceeds of crime. Given that the dealer paid adequate consideration and had no suspicion of wrongdoing, this defense could be invoked if allegations arise.

Overseas Conduct Defence: Legality in Foreign Jurisdictions

Sections 327(2A), 328(3), and 329(2A) of POCA 2002 provide a defense when the relevant conduct occurred outside the UK and was lawful in the jurisdiction where it took place. This defense acknowledges the variations in legal standards across different countries.

Critical Considerations:

  • Legal Compliance Abroad: The conduct must be legal under the laws of the country where it occurred.

  • Dual Criminality: The conduct must not constitute an offense under UK law punishable by imprisonment for 12 months or more.

  • Designated Countries: Applies to countries not subject to financial sanctions or identified as high-risk.

Example Scenario:

A UK businessperson engages in financial activities abroad that are legal in that country but would be considered money laundering under UK law. If prosecuted in the UK, the individual may assert the overseas conduct defense, provided they meet the necessary conditions.

Practical Applications in Legal Context

Understanding how these defenses operate in practice is central for legal professionals dealing with money laundering allegations. They must assess the specific circumstances of each case, considering factors such as timing, knowledge, intent, and compliance with reporting obligations.

Case Study: The Construction Firm

A construction firm unknowingly accepts funds from a client involved in organized crime. The firm conducts due diligence but does not detect any red flags. When authorities investigate, the firm relies on the adequate consideration defense, demonstrating that the transactions were at market value and conducted without suspicion.

Case Study: The International Trader

An international trader conducts transactions in a country where certain financial practices are legal but would be illegal in the UK. Upon scrutiny by UK authorities, the trader invokes the overseas conduct defense, providing evidence of the legality of their actions abroad and compliance with local laws.

Interplay of Defenses and Regulatory Obligations

The defenses available under POCA 2002 must be considered alongside the obligations imposed by the Money Laundering Regulations 2017. Compliance with customer due diligence procedures, ongoing monitoring, and prompt reporting of suspicious activities strengthens the position of individuals and entities facing allegations.

For instance, failing to conduct proper due diligence may undermine the ability to rely on the adequate consideration defense. Similarly, neglecting to submit a SAR in a timely manner could invalidate the authorized disclosure defense.

Conclusion

The defenses to money laundering offenses under UK law require meticulous understanding of legal provisions and their interrelation. Authorized disclosure allows individuals to mitigate liability by proactively reporting suspicions to the NCA. The adequate consideration defense protects those who engage in fair market transactions without awareness of the property's criminal origins. The overseas conduct defense acknowledges the legality of actions performed in other jurisdictions when they meet specific criteria.

These defenses interact with regulatory requirements, accentuating the importance of compliance with the Money Laundering Regulations 2017. Proper implementation of due diligence, risk assessments, and internal controls is essential. Legal practitioners must manage these complex legal situations, ensuring that all actions align with statutory obligations and that defenses are appropriately applied in the context of each case.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Barbri SQE
One-time Fee
$3,800-6,900
BPP SQE
One-time Fee
$5,400-8,200
College of Legal P...
One-time Fee
$2,300-9,100
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350
Law Training Centr...
One-time Fee
$500-6,200
QLTS SQE
One-time Fee
$2,500-3,800
University of Law...
One-time Fee
$6,200-22,400

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of December 2024. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

Practice. Learn. Excel.

Features designed to support your job and test preparation

Question Bank

Access 100,000+ questions that adapt to your performance level and learning style.

Performance Analytics

Track your progress across topics and identify knowledge gaps with comprehensive analytics and insights.

Multi-Assessment Support

Prepare for multiple exams simultaneously, from academic tests to professional certifications.

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal