Overview
Pre-action protocols, outlined in the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), aim to:
- Resolve Early: Encourage parties to settle before formal court actions.
- Reduce Costs: Manage cases early and share information to lower expenses.
- Ensure Fairness: Require open information exchange for proper case assessment.
- Consider Alternative Resolutions: Support using Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) instead of litigation.
Legal Framework
Rooted in CPR Part 1, pre-action protocols help:
- Identify core issues early
- Encourage cooperation between parties
- Avoid unnecessary litigation
- Manage cases efficiently if litigation is necessary
Procedural Steps to Follow
Following pre-action protocols involves a clear process to ensure all parties are informed before litigation:
1. Letter of Claim
The claimant sends a detailed letter stating:
- The facts and legal basis
- Relief sought
- Estimated financial loss (if applicable)
- Key documents
2. Defendant's Response
The defendant responds within a reasonable time, addressing:
- Claim acceptance or denial
- Reasons for denial
- Each allegation
- Other involved parties
- ADR suggestions
3. Exploring ADR Options
Both parties should consider methods like:
- Mediation
- Arbitration
- Early neutral evaluation
4. Document Disclosure
Parties disclose key documents to:
- Clarify issues
- Make informed settlement decisions
- Reduce litigation costs
5. Expert Evidence
Technical cases may require expert evidence or a joint expert appointment.
Consequences of Non-compliance
Non-compliance can lead to:
1. Procedural Sanctions
- Stay of proceedings
- Striking out of statements
2. Financial Penalties
- Adverse costs orders
- Indemnity costs
3. Evidential Consequences
- Adverse inferences
- Exclusion of evidence
4. Interest Rate Adjustments
- Changes in interest on damages
5. Impact on Case Management
- Stricter directions or faster trial schedules
Example: Pre-action Protocol in Practice
Consider a construction dispute between BuildCo Ltd and PropertyDev plc:
- PropertyDev initiates proceedings without following the protocol.
- BuildCo requests a stay due to non-compliance.
- The court grants the stay and orders PropertyDev to cover BuildCo's costs.
- Proceedings resume after protocol completion, limiting PropertyDev's cost recovery.
This example shows the importance of protocol adherence and possible repercussions for non-compliance.
Conclusion
Pre-action protocols are important to the English civil justice system, promoting efficient dispute resolution and fairness. For SQE1 FLK1 exam candidates, understanding these protocols is key to exam and professional success.
Key points:
- Pre-action protocols focus on early resolution, cost reduction, and fairness.
- Following procedural steps is essential, including claim letters and ADR exploration.
- Non-compliance may result in serious consequences such as procedural sanctions and financial penalties.
- Applying these protocols is vital for effective legal practice.