Entering and setting aside judgment in default

Can You Answer This?

Practice with real exam questions

EZ Foods Ltd obtained a default judgment against Big City Markets arising from an unpaid invoice for delivered goods. Big City Markets contends it did not receive the claim documents because it had relocated its registered office address shortly before service. The defendant states that it made a partial payment toward the invoice prior to the judgment being entered. The directors also say they have a strong defense to the claim, alleging overcharging. Upon discovering the judgment, Big City Markets promptly applied to have it set aside.


Which statement best reflects how the court is likely to handle this application under the Civil Procedure Rules?

Introduction

Default judgments are decisions rendered by a court when a defendant fails to respond to a claim within the specified timelines established by the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR). This legal mechanism ensures that claimants can obtain judgment without unnecessary delays when defendants do not participate in the proceedings. Understanding the procedures for entering and setting aside default judgments is important for effectively managing civil litigation under the CPR.

Entering a Default Judgment

Obtaining a default judgment becomes possible when a defendant fails to file a response, such as an acknowledgment of service or a defense, within the prescribed time limits set by the CPR. The CPR outlines the procedural steps required to secure such a judgment.

Procedural Steps

The process involves several key steps:

  1. Issuance and Service of the Claim Form: The claimant initiates proceedings by issuing a claim form, which sets out the details of the claim and the relief sought. Proper service of the claim form and particulars of claim to the defendant is needed to proceed.

  2. Acknowledgment of Service: The defendant is required to acknowledge service within 14 days of being served with the claim form, formally indicating receipt of the claim.

  3. Filing of the Defense: The defendant must file a defense within 28 days after service of the particulars of claim (or within 14 days of acknowledgment of service). Failure to do so allows the claimant to seek a default judgment.

  4. Default: If the defendant does not file an acknowledgment of service or a defense within the specified time limits, the claimant may request a default judgment.

  5. Application for Default Judgment: The claimant can apply for a default judgment using Form N225 for specified monetary claims or Form N227 for unspecified claims.

  6. Court’s Decision: If the procedural requirements are satisfied and no defense has been filed, the court will typically grant the default judgment as requested.

  7. Enforcement of Judgment: Once the default judgment is entered, the claimant may take steps to enforce the judgment to recover the amount awarded.

Key Considerations

Precise compliance with procedural timelines and the accuracy of documentation are essential when seeking a default judgment. Failure to align with the CPR requirements may result in the application being rejected or other adverse procedural consequences.

Setting Aside a Default Judgment

Under CPR Part 13, defendants may apply to have a default judgment set aside. The grounds for setting aside a default judgment are categorized into mandatory and discretionary grounds.

Mandatory Grounds for Setting Aside

Under CPR 13.2, the court must set aside a default judgment if:

  1. Judgment Entered Incorrectly: The judgment was entered prematurely, such as before the time for acknowledging service or filing a defense had expired.

  2. Payment Made Before Judgment: The defendant had satisfied the claim before the judgment was entered.

  3. Improper Service: The defendant was not properly served with the claim form, leading to a failure to respond.

Discretionary Grounds for Setting Aside

Under CPR 13.3, the court may, at its discretion, set aside or vary a default judgment if:

  1. Real Prospect of Success: The defendant has a real prospect of successfully defending the claim.

  2. Some Other Good Reason: There is some other justification for the defendant's failure to acknowledge service or file a defense, or for the defendant to be allowed to defend the claim.

When considering whether to exercise its discretion, the court will also evaluate:

  • Promptness of the Application: The defendant must apply to set aside the judgment promptly upon learning of it.

  • Explanation for Default: The reasons for the defendant's failure to respond must be satisfactory.

  • Prejudice to Parties: The court will consider any potential prejudice to the claimant or defendant resulting from setting aside the judgment.

Case Study: Gentry v Miller [2016] EWCA Civ 141

In Gentry v Miller, the Court of Appeal emphasized the necessity of scrutinizing the circumstances surrounding a default judgment when determining whether to set it aside. The court highlighted that if the defendant has acted improperly or abused the court process, relief may be denied. This case illustrates the court's careful balancing of procedural fairness with the need to prevent abuse of process.

Strategic Considerations

For Claimants

  1. Timing: Ensure that the application for default judgment is made only after the defendant's time to respond has expired to avoid premature applications.

  2. Procedural Compliance: Follow the CPR requirements when applying for default judgment to prevent applications from being rejected.

  3. Documentary Evidence: Keep accurate records of all procedural steps and communications to support the application.

  4. Risk Assessment: Consider the possibility that the default judgment may be set aside and the implications for costs and litigation strategy.

For Defendants

  1. Prompt Action: Act immediately upon discovering a default judgment to apply for it to be set aside, demonstrating respect for court procedures.

  2. Substantive Defense: Present evidence of a real prospect of successfully defending the claim or provide a substantial reason for the failure to respond.

  3. Addressing Prejudice: Mitigate any prejudice to the claimant caused by the delay, such as offering to cover additional costs incurred.

  4. Alternative Resolution: Explore options for settling the dispute outside of court, such as negotiation or mediation.

Illustrative Examples

Example 1: Commercial Contract Dispute

A company failed to file a defense due to an internal administrative error, resulting in a default judgment. Upon realizing the oversight, the company promptly applied to set aside the judgment, demonstrating a real prospect of successfully defending the claim based on contractual terms. The court, exercising its discretion under CPR 13.3, set aside the default judgment, allowing the case to proceed.

Example 2: Service Irregularity

A defendant did not receive the claim form due to an error in the service address. Unaware of the proceedings, the defendant did not file an acknowledgment of service or defense, and a default judgment was entered. The defendant applied to have the judgment set aside on the mandatory ground of improper service under CPR 13.2. The court set aside the judgment, noting the failure of proper service.

Example 3: Personal Injury Claim

In a personal injury claim, the defendant failed to respond within the specified time because of hospitalization. Upon recovery, the defendant applied promptly to set aside the default judgment, providing medical evidence and a defense with a real prospect of success. The court considered the application under CPR 13.3 and, exercising its discretion, set aside the judgment.

Conclusion

The procedure for entering and setting aside default judgments under the Civil Procedure Rules involves a complex interplay of strict procedural requirements and judicial discretion. The mandatory grounds for setting aside a default judgment, as stipulated in CPR 13.2, require the court to act where procedural errors have occurred, such as improper service or premature judgments. In contrast, the discretionary grounds under CPR 13.3 necessitate that the defendant demonstrates a real prospect of successfully defending the claim or presents another compelling reason for setting aside the judgment. The case of Gentry v Miller [2016] EWCA Civ 141 exemplifies the court's careful assessment of the defendant's conduct and the circumstances surrounding the default.

Understanding the precise requirements for both entering a default judgment and applying to set it aside is fundamental. Claimants must meticulously follow procedural steps to secure a valid judgment, while defendants must act promptly and provide substantial grounds when seeking relief. The interaction between procedural compliance and judicial discretion highlights the importance of thoroughly understanding the CPR provisions governing default judgments.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Barbri SQE
One-time Fee
$3,800-6,900
BPP SQE
One-time Fee
$5,400-8,200
College of Legal P...
One-time Fee
$2,300-9,100
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350
Law Training Centr...
One-time Fee
$500-6,200
QLTS SQE
One-time Fee
$2,500-3,800
University of Law...
One-time Fee
$6,200-22,400

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of December 2024. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

Practice. Learn. Excel.

Features designed to support your job and test preparation

Question Bank

Access 100,000+ questions that adapt to your performance level and learning style.

Performance Analytics

Track your progress across topics and identify knowledge gaps with comprehensive analytics and insights.

Multi-Assessment Support

Prepare for multiple exams simultaneously, from academic tests to professional certifications.

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal