Mistake

Can You Answer This?

Practice with real exam questions

Marco, a commercial painting supplier, enters into a contract to sell a large quantity of premium canvas to Jade, an art studio owner. Both parties believe the canvas is suitable for professional oil-based painting based on the product label. Shortly after delivery, Jade discovers that the canvas is actually made for watercolor only and is unusable for her intended purpose. Marco claims he had no idea the product label was incorrect, while Jade insists she relied solely on Marco’s assurances. Neither party had the canvas tested or sought confirmation from the manufacturer.


Which of the following statements best describes the legal principles that may apply to this scenario under contract law?

Introduction

In contract law, a mistake occurs when parties enter into an agreement under a fundamental error concerning an essential fact or assumption. This error can significantly affect the validity of the contract, potentially rendering it void or voidable. Mistakes are classified into three main types: common mistake, mutual mistake, and unilateral mistake. Each category has specific legal principles and requirements that determine whether a contract is enforceable. Understanding these concepts is important for analyzing contractual disputes involving mistakes.

Common Mistake

A common mistake happens when both parties share the same erroneous belief about a fundamental fact existing at the time of the contract. This shared error must be so significant that it renders the subject matter of the contract essentially different from what the parties believed it to be.

Legal Framework

In the landmark case of Bell v Lever Bros Ltd [1932] AC 161, the court established that for a common mistake to render a contract void, the mistake must be fundamental to the identity of the subject matter, not merely its quality. Later, in Great Peace Shipping Ltd v Tsavliris Salvage (International) Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1407, the Court of Appeal set out five conditions that must be met:

  1. Common Assumption: Both parties shared an assumption about the existence of a certain state of affairs.
  2. No Warranty: Neither party warranted that this state of affairs existed.
  3. No Fault: The non-existence of the state of affairs was not due to the fault of either party.
  4. Impossibility of Performance: The non-existence makes performance of the contract impossible.
  5. Essential Attribute: The state of affairs may concern the existence or a necessary attribute of the consideration.

Practical Example

Picture two art enthusiasts, Emma and Liam, agreeing on the sale of a rare painting believed to be an original by a famous artist. Unbeknownst to both, the painting had been destroyed in a fire the day before their agreement. Since the subject matter no longer exists, their shared mistake about the existence of the painting could render the contract void.

Mutual Mistake

A mutual mistake occurs when both parties misunderstand each other regarding a fundamental term of the contract. Essentially, each party is mistaken about the other’s intention, leading to a situation where there is no true "meeting of the minds."

Legal Principles

For a mutual mistake to void a contract, the misunderstanding must be substantial, affecting the terms or subject matter of the agreement. The classic illustration is the case of Raffles v Wichelhaus (1864) 2 H&C 906. In this case, a contract for the sale of cotton referred to a ship named "Peerless." Unknown to both parties, there were two ships with that name sailing at different times. Each party had a different ship in mind, leading to a mutual misunderstanding and a void contract.

Practical Example

Consider a scenario where Alex agrees to buy "100 shares in Apple" from Jordan. Alex believes he is purchasing shares in Apple Inc., the technology company, while Jordan thinks he's selling shares in a local fruit orchard named Apple Farms. Since they are thinking of entirely different entities, there is no true agreement, and the contract may be void due to mutual mistake.

Unilateral Mistake

A unilateral mistake happens when only one party is mistaken about a fundamental aspect of the contract, and the other party is aware of the mistake. Depending on the circumstances, such a mistake can render the contract voidable.

Types of Unilateral Mistake

  1. Mistake as to Identity: One party is mistaken about the identity of the other party.
  2. Mistake as to Terms: One party is mistaken about a fundamental term of the contract, and the other party is aware of the mistake.

Legal Framework

For a unilateral mistake to affect the validity of a contract, certain conditions must be met:

  • Knowledge of the Mistake: The non-mistaken party knew or ought to have known about the other party's mistake.
  • Fundamental Aspect: The mistake relates to a major term or identity key to the agreement.
  • Absence of Negligence: The mistaken party was not negligent in making the mistake.

Mistake as to Identity

In Shogun Finance Ltd v Hudson [2003] UKHL 62, a fraudster obtained a car by misrepresenting himself as someone else using a stolen identity. The finance company believed they were contracting with the individual whose identity was stolen. The House of Lords held that the contract was void because the company intended to deal only with the person named in the documents.

Practical Example

Suppose Natalie sells a valuable antique vase to someone she believes is a reputable collector, Michael Thompson. The buyer presents identification confirming this identity. In reality, the buyer is an imposter named Peter using forged documents. Since Natalie intended to contract with Michael, not Peter, the contract may be void due to a mistake as to identity.

Mistake as to Terms

In Hartog v Colin & Shields [1939] 3 All ER 566, a seller mistakenly offered hare skins at a price per pound instead of per piece. The buyer knew the price was significantly lower than market value and accepted the offer. The court held that the buyer could not enforce the contract because he must have realized the seller's mistake.

Practical Example

Visualize a retailer mistakenly advertising laptops for 50insteadof50 instead of 500 due to a typographical error. A customer notices the unusually low price, suspects a mistake, but quickly places an order for multiple units. Since the customer was likely aware of the error, the retailer may be able to void the contract.

Role of Equity

Equity can intervene to alleviate harsh outcomes resulting from mistakes in contracts. Equitable remedies aim to achieve fairness when strict legal principles would lead to unjust results.

Rectification

Rectification allows a court to amend a written contract so that it reflects the true agreement between the parties. To obtain rectification, it must be shown that:

  • There was a prior agreement with clear terms.
  • The written document fails to reflect this agreement due to a mutual mistake.
  • The mistake was common to both parties or, in some cases, induced by one party.

Example

In Joscelyne v Nissen [1970] 2 QB 86, a father agreed to transfer his business to his daughter, with an understanding that she would pay certain household expenses. The written contract omitted this term. The court rectified the contract to include the agreed-upon expenses, ensuring it reflected the parties' true intentions.

Rescission

Rescission allows a contract to be set aside, returning both parties to their pre-contractual positions. Equity may grant rescission when enforcing the contract would be unconscionable due to a fundamental mistake.

Example

Suppose two businesses enter into a contract based on a shared erroneous belief about a market condition that significantly affects the contract's purpose. Enforcing the contract would cause undue hardship. A court may grant rescission to prevent an unfair outcome.

Practical Implications

Understanding the law of mistake is important for anyone involved in contract drafting, negotiation, or legal advisory roles.

Contract Drafting and Negotiation

Clear communication is key to prevent misunderstandings. Parties should:

  • Use precise language in contracts.
  • Verify critical facts and assumptions.
  • Clarify definitions of key terms.

Legal Advice

Legal professionals must:

  • Identify potential mistakes in agreements.
  • Advise clients on the consequences and remedies.
  • Assess whether equitable relief is available.

Hypothetical Scenario Combining Principles

Let's consider a complex situation:

Tech Solutions Ltd agrees to buy specialized software from Innovative Software Inc. Both believe the software includes a specific feature key for Tech Solutions. Unknown to both, the feature was discontinued.

  • Common Mistake: Both parties mistakenly believe the software includes the feature.
  • Mutual Mistake: They misunderstand each other's descriptions of the software capabilities.
  • Unilateral Mistake: If Innovative Software Inc knew the feature was absent but didn't inform Tech Solutions.

Analyzing this scenario involves applying principles from all three types of mistakes. Determining the contract's validity and the appropriate remedy would depend on the specific facts and whether the legal requirements for each type of mistake are met.

Conclusion

Mistakes in contract law can significantly affect the validity and enforceability of agreements. By examining the principles of common mistake, mutual mistake, and unilateral mistake, we see how fundamental errors can render contracts void or voidable. Key cases like Bell v Lever Bros Ltd, Raffles v Wichelhaus, and Shogun Finance Ltd v Hudson establish the legal frameworks for these concepts. Understanding the specific requirements and how different types of mistakes interact is necessary when analyzing contractual disputes. Equitable remedies, such as rectification and rescission, play a significant role in ensuring fair outcomes when strict legal rules fall short. Applying these principles to real-world scenarios enables a thorough assessment of contractual validity and the potential for remedies under the law.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Barbri SQE
One-time Fee
$3,800-6,900
BPP SQE
One-time Fee
$5,400-8,200
College of Legal P...
One-time Fee
$2,300-9,100
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350
Law Training Centr...
One-time Fee
$500-6,200
QLTS SQE
One-time Fee
$2,500-3,800
University of Law...
One-time Fee
$6,200-22,400

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of December 2024. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

Practice. Learn. Excel.

Features designed to support your job and test preparation

Question Bank

Access 100,000+ questions that adapt to your performance level and learning style.

Performance Analytics

Track your progress across topics and identify knowledge gaps with comprehensive analytics and insights.

Multi-Assessment Support

Prepare for multiple exams simultaneously, from academic tests to professional certifications.

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal