Unfair contract terms

Can You Answer This?

Practice with real exam questions

Sam operates a small painting enterprise. He purchases his materials from a large national supplier. The contract with the supplier permits unilateral price increases and schedule changes. Another clause attempts to exclude liability entirely if the paint is defective, even if it causes property damage. Sam has already received multiple complaints regarding substandard paint quality, raising concerns about the enforceability of these terms under English law.


Which of the following statements best reflects how these clauses would be assessed under relevant legislation on unfair contract terms?

Introduction

Unfair contract terms are provisions within agreements that create a severe imbalance in the parties' rights and obligations, to the detriment of one party and contrary to the requirement of good faith. They play an important role in contract law, potentially rendering certain terms unenforceable and affecting the validity of contracts under English law. Understanding the legislative frameworks governing unfair contract terms, notably the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA 2015) and the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (UCTA 1977), is essential for comprehending how contracts are regulated and enforced.

The Legal Framework of Unfair Contract Terms

Exploring the legal domain of unfair contract terms involves examining the key statutes regulating these provisions. Two primary legislative acts form the backbone of this area:

The Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA 2015)

The CRA 2015 was introduced to consolidate and improve consumer protection laws, ensuring fairness and transparency in consumer contracts. It establishes clear guidelines for determining when a term is unfair.

  • Section 62 defines an unfair term as one that causes a significant imbalance in the parties' rights and obligations to the detriment of the consumer, contrary to the requirement of good faith.
  • Section 64 excludes certain terms from the fairness test if they are transparent and prominent, specifically terms that set the price or define the main subject matter of the contract.
  • Section 65 prohibits traders from excluding or restricting liability for death or personal injury resulting from negligence.
  • Schedule 2 provides an indicative and non-exhaustive list of terms that may be regarded as unfair, often referred to as the "grey list."

The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (UCTA 1977)

While the CRA 2015 primarily addresses consumer contracts, the UCTA 1977 remains relevant, particularly in business-to-business agreements. It restricts the extent to which liability can be excluded for breach of contract and negligence, subjecting exclusion clauses to a reasonableness test.

  • Sections 2 to 7 of UCTA limit the ability to exclude liability for negligence, breach of contract, and statutory implied terms, requiring that such exclusions meet the standard of reasonableness.

Key Components of Unfair Contract Terms

Determining whether a contract term is unfair involves analyzing several key components. Let's break down these elements to understand how they function in practice.

Significant Imbalance

A term creates a significant imbalance if it excessively favors one party over the other. This often occurs when there is a disparity in bargaining power or knowledge between the parties.

Analogy: Consider playing a game where one player sets all the rules and can change them at will—it wouldn't be a fair game, would it?

Example: A contract that allows a service provider to alter fees without notice places the consumer at a disadvantage, creating an imbalance.

Contrary to Good Faith

Good faith requires parties to deal openly and fairly with each other, without hidden agendas or deceptive practices. A term is contrary to good faith if it's imposed in a way that surprises the disadvantaged party or if it exploits their lack of understanding.

Cultural Reference: It's like buying a ticket to a concert, only to find out there's a hidden clause requiring you to clean up after the event—something you wouldn't expect nor agree to if you knew.

Transparency and Prominence

For terms to be considered fair, they must be transparent (written in plain and intelligible language) and prominent (brought to the consumer's attention in a way that the average consumer would be aware of them).

Example: Important terms hidden in the fine print or buried in lengthy terms and conditions may not meet the transparency requirement.

The Reasonableness Test under UCTA 1977

In business contracts, exclusion and limitation clauses are subjected to the reasonableness test under UCTA 1977. This test assesses whether the term is fair and reasonable in the context of the agreement.

Factors Considered:

  • Bargaining Positions: Were the parties on equal footing, or did one have a significant advantage?
  • Inducements Offered: Was the disadvantaged party given something in return for agreeing to the term?
  • Awareness: Did the party know, or should they have known, about the term?
  • Customary Terms: Is the term common practice in the industry?

Rhetorical Question: If a supplier includes a clause that completely excludes liability for defective products, is that reasonable when the buyer has little choice but to accept?

Landmark Case Law Shaping Unfair Contract Terms

Judicial interpretations are significant in shaping the understanding of unfair contract terms. Let's explore some important cases that have influenced this area of law.

Director General of Fair Trading v First National Bank plc [2001] UKHL 52

Summary: The House of Lords considered whether a term allowing a bank to charge interest on defaulted payments was unfair. The court held that the term was not unfair, as it pertained to the adequacy of the price or remuneration, which is excluded from the fairness test under Section 64 of the CRA 2015.

Impact: This case highlighted the importance of distinguishing between core terms and ancillary terms when assessing unfairness.

ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis [2015] UKSC 67

Summary: The Supreme Court examined whether an £85 charge for overstaying in a car park was an unfair term or an unenforceable penalty. The court ruled that the charge was neither unfair nor a penalty, as it served a legitimate interest.

Impact: This decision emphasized that terms serving a legitimate purpose, even if burdensome, may not be deemed unfair.

Aziz v Caixa d'Estalvis de Catalunya, Tarragona i Manresa (Case C-415/11)

Summary: The European Court of Justice provided guidance on assessing unfair terms, stating that national courts must consider whether, contrary to the requirement of good faith, the term causes a significant imbalance in the parties' rights and obligations.

Impact: The case underscored the need for courts to assess both substance and procedural aspects when evaluating fairness.

Practical Applications

Understanding unfair contract terms isn't just about theory—it's about recognizing how these principles apply in real-world scenarios.

Automatic Renewal Clauses

Scenario: A gym membership contract automatically renews without clearly informing the member, and imposes hefty cancellation fees.

Analysis: The lack of transparency and the imposition of significant charges may render the term unfair under Section 62 of the CRA 2015.

Unilateral Variation Clauses

Scenario: An internet service provider reserves the right to change the terms of service, including pricing, without notice.

Analysis: Such a term may create a significant imbalance and could be seen as contrary to good faith, potentially being deemed unfair.

Exclusion of Liability

Scenario: A software license agreement includes a clause that excludes all liability for any harm caused by the software, including physical injury.

Analysis: Under Section 65 of the CRA 2015 and Section 2 of UCTA 1977, excluding liability for death or personal injury due to negligence is prohibited.

Interplay Between the CRA 2015 and UCTA 1977

While both statutes aim to prevent unfair terms, they operate in different contexts. The CRA 2015 focuses on consumer contracts, providing broader protection, whereas UCTA 1977 primarily addresses business contracts and specific types of exclusion clauses.

Example: In a contract between two businesses, a limitation clause will be assessed under UCTA's reasonableness test, considering the industry's standard practices and the parties' relative bargaining power.

Conclusion

The complex interaction between statutory regulations and judicial interpretations shapes the enforcement of unfair contract terms in English contract law. The Consumer Rights Act 2015 and the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 provide the statutory framework, each operating within its domain—consumer contracts and business agreements, respectively. The principles of significant imbalance, good faith, and transparency are key to assessing whether a term is unfair.

Judicial decisions, such as those in Director General of Fair Trading v First National Bank plc and ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis, illustrate how courts interpret and apply these statutory provisions. These cases demonstrate how terms are evaluated in context, considering factors like legitimate interest and the distinction between core and ancillary terms.

Analyzing unfair contract terms requires a detailed understanding of the concepts involved. For instance, determining whether an exclusion clause in a business contract passes the reasonableness test under UCTA 1977 requires examining the parties' bargaining positions, the availability of alternatives, and industry standards.

In practice, ensuring compliance with the CRA 2015 involves crafting terms that are transparent and prominent, especially when they define the main subject matter or set the price. Under UCTA 1977, businesses must ensure that any exclusion or limitation clauses are reasonable, taking into account the fairness of the term and its impact on the parties' rights and obligations.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Barbri SQE
One-time Fee
$3,800-6,900
BPP SQE
One-time Fee
$5,400-8,200
College of Legal P...
One-time Fee
$2,300-9,100
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350
Law Training Centr...
One-time Fee
$500-6,200
QLTS SQE
One-time Fee
$2,500-3,800
University of Law...
One-time Fee
$6,200-22,400

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of December 2024. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

Practice. Learn. Excel.

Features designed to support your job and test preparation

Question Bank

Access 100,000+ questions that adapt to your performance level and learning style.

Performance Analytics

Track your progress across topics and identify knowledge gaps with comprehensive analytics and insights.

Multi-Assessment Support

Prepare for multiple exams simultaneously, from academic tests to professional certifications.

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal