Advising clients at the police station - When identification procedures must be held

Learning Outcomes

After reading this article, you will be able to identify when police must hold an identification procedure under PACE Code D, explain the main types of procedure, and advise clients on their rights and options at the police station. You will also be able to spot common exceptions, understand the legal adviser's role, and apply these principles to SQE1-style scenarios.

SQE1 Syllabus

For SQE1, you are required to understand the rules and practical application of identification procedures at the police station. In your revision, focus on:

  • the legal triggers for holding an identification procedure under PACE 1984 and Code D
  • the main types of identification procedures and their key features
  • the exceptions to the requirement to hold a procedure
  • the legal adviser's role in advising and protecting the client's rights during identification procedures
  • the consequences of refusing to participate and the impact on evidence admissibility

Test Your Knowledge

Attempt these questions before reading this article. If you find some difficult or cannot remember the answers, remember to look more closely at that area during your revision.

  1. Under what circumstances must the police hold an identification procedure for a suspect?
  2. What are the four main types of identification procedures recognised by PACE Code D?
  3. Name two situations where an identification procedure is not required, even if a witness claims to recognise the suspect.
  4. What is the legal adviser's role when a client is asked to participate in an identification procedure?

Introduction

When a client is arrested or attends the police station as a suspect, identification evidence can be decisive. The law sets strict rules for when police must hold an identification procedure, how it must be conducted, and how legal advisers should protect the client's rights. For SQE1, you must know the triggers for holding a procedure, the main types, the exceptions, and the adviser's duties.

When Must an Identification Procedure Be Held?

PACE 1984 Code D sets out when police are required to arrange an identification procedure. The main trigger is when there is a dispute about whether the suspect is the person seen by a witness during the commission of the offence.

Key Term: identification procedure
A formal process in which a witness is asked to identify a suspect from a group of people or images, following strict rules to ensure fairness.

Police must hold an identification procedure as soon as practicable if:

  • a witness claims to have identified or can identify a suspect, and
  • the suspect disputes being the person seen, or
  • there is a reasonable chance a witness could identify the suspect.

This applies whether or not the suspect is under arrest or in custody.

Key Term: PACE Code D
The Code of Practice under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 governing identification procedures and related safeguards for suspects.

Worked Example 1.1

Scenario:
A witness to a robbery tells police she could identify the robber if she saw him again. The police arrest a suspect who denies involvement.

Answer:
The police must arrange an identification procedure as soon as practicable, as there is a witness who claims she can identify the suspect and the suspect disputes being the person seen.

Exceptions: When a Procedure Is Not Required

There are important exceptions where an identification procedure is not needed, even if a witness claims to recognise the suspect. These include:

  • where it is not practicable to hold a procedure (e.g., the witness is unavailable)
  • where the suspect's identity is not in dispute (e.g., the suspect admits being present and the witness's account matches)
  • where the witness already knows the suspect well (e.g., family, close friends, or regular associates)

Key Term: known to the witness
A situation where the witness is already familiar with the suspect, making a formal identification procedure unnecessary.

Key Term: not practicable
Circumstances where it is impossible or unreasonable to arrange a formal identification procedure, such as lack of available witnesses or urgent operational reasons.

Worked Example 1.2

Scenario:
A shop assistant is assaulted by her ex-partner, whom she has known for years. The ex-partner is arrested and denies the assault.

Answer:
No identification procedure is required. The witness already knows the suspect well, so a formal procedure would serve no useful purpose.

Types of Identification Procedures

PACE Code D recognises four main types of identification procedures:

  1. Video Identification:
    The witness views a video containing the suspect and at least eight others of similar appearance.
  2. Identification Parade:
    The suspect stands in a line with at least eight others who resemble them. The witness views the line, usually through a screen.
  3. Group Identification:
    The suspect is observed by the witness in a group of people in a public place or informal setting.
  4. Confrontation:
    The witness is brought face-to-face with the suspect, used only when other procedures are impracticable.

Key Term: video identification
A procedure where a witness is shown moving or still images of the suspect and others of similar appearance to test their ability to identify the suspect.

Key Term: identification parade
A live lineup in which the suspect stands with others of similar appearance for the witness to view.

Key Term: group identification
A procedure where the suspect is seen by the witness among a group of people in an informal setting, such as a shopping centre.

Key Term: confrontation
A direct meeting between the witness and the suspect, used only as a last resort when other procedures are not possible.

Worked Example 1.3

Scenario:
Police arrest a suspect who refuses to take part in a video identification or parade. The witness is available and willing to attend.

Answer:
The police may arrange a group identification or, if that is not practicable, a confrontation. The suspect's refusal can be mentioned in court and may allow the police to use alternative procedures.

The Legal Adviser's Role

Legal advisers have a critical function in protecting the client's rights during identification procedures. Their main duties include:

  • advising the client on whether to participate and explaining the consequences of refusal (such as adverse inferences)
  • ensuring the procedure is conducted fairly and in accordance with Code D
  • checking that the images or lineup members are sufficiently similar to the client
  • ensuring the witness and client do not see each other before the procedure
  • making sure any objections or irregularities are recorded
  • attending the procedure where possible to observe and intervene if necessary

Key Term: adverse inference
A negative conclusion that may be drawn by the court if a suspect refuses to participate in an identification procedure without good reason.

Exam Warning

If a client refuses to participate in an identification procedure without a valid reason, the court may allow the police to use alternative methods and may permit the prosecution to comment on the refusal at trial.

Consequences of Refusing to Participate

If a suspect refuses to take part in an identification procedure, the police may:

  • use alternative procedures (e.g., group identification or confrontation)
  • mention the refusal in court, which may be used as evidence of consciousness of guilt
  • proceed covertly, such as using images taken without the suspect's knowledge

Legal advisers should warn clients that refusal can have negative consequences and should only be advised if there is a clear legal or tactical reason.

Practical Safeguards and Common Pitfalls

Legal advisers should always:

  • check that the procedure is conducted by an independent officer not involved in the investigation
  • ensure the initial description given by the witness is disclosed and compared to the client's appearance
  • confirm that witnesses are kept apart and do not discuss the case before or after the procedure
  • object if the lineup or images are not sufficiently similar to the client

Revision Tip

Always ask for the initial witness description and compare it to your client's appearance. If there are significant differences, raise this before the procedure.

Summary

Identification ProcedureTrigger for HoldingMain FeaturesExceptions
Video IdentificationDisputed identity, witness can identifyImages of suspect + 8+ foilsNot practicable, witness knows suspect
Identification ParadeDisputed identity, witness can identifyLive lineup, suspect + 8+ foilsNot practicable, witness knows suspect
Group IdentificationSuspect refuses other procedures or not practicableSuspect in group in publicNot practicable
ConfrontationAll other procedures not possibleFace-to-face meetingOnly as last resort

Key Point Checklist

This article has covered the following key knowledge points:

  • The police must hold an identification procedure if a witness can identify a suspect and the suspect disputes being the person seen.
  • Main types of identification procedure are video identification, identification parade, group identification, and confrontation.
  • Exceptions include cases where the witness already knows the suspect well, or where it is not practicable to hold a procedure.
  • Legal advisers must advise clients on participation, ensure fairness, and record any objections or irregularities.
  • Refusal to participate can lead to adverse inferences and the use of alternative procedures.

Key Terms and Concepts

  • identification procedure
  • PACE Code D
  • known to the witness
  • not practicable
  • video identification
  • identification parade
  • group identification
  • confrontation
  • adverse inference
The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Barbri SQE
One-time Fee
$3,800-6,900
BPP SQE
One-time Fee
$5,400-8,200
College of Legal P...
One-time Fee
$2,300-9,100
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350
Law Training Centr...
One-time Fee
$500-6,200
QLTS SQE
One-time Fee
$2,500-3,800
University of Law...
One-time Fee
$6,200-22,400

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal