Powers of the Court of Appeal

Can You Answer This?

Practice with real exam questions

Daniel was convicted of aggravated burglary in the Crown Court after an eyewitness placed him at the scene. One year later, a newly discovered CCTV recording emerged depicting an individual with notably different characteristics committing the offence. Daniel’s legal team obtained forensic analysis verifying the video’s authenticity and argued it could exonerate him. They seek permission to appeal, asserting that this evidence renders the original trial outcome unsafe. The prosecution accepts the discovery is relevant but maintains the conviction should stand.


Which of the following is the single best statement regarding the Court of Appeal’s powers to admit new evidence under Section 23 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968?

Introduction

The Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) holds a major position in the English legal system, tasked with reviewing decisions from the Crown Court to ensure the proper administration of justice. It operates under the framework established by the Criminal Appeal Act 1968, with jurisdiction primarily over criminal cases appealed from the Crown Court. Understanding the Court's powers, particularly in relation to appeals against convictions and sentences, is key for comprehending the finer points of criminal procedure and the safeguards in place to prevent miscarriages of justice.

Legal Framework and Jurisdiction

The powers of the Court of Appeal are outlined by several key statutes, most notably the Criminal Appeal Act 1968. This legislation defines the Court's authority to hear appeals against convictions and sentences imposed by the Crown Court. The Court's jurisdiction is specifically confined to criminal cases from the Crown Court, distinguishing it from other appellate routes such as those from the magistrates' courts, which follow a different procedural path.

Statutory Provisions

Several sections of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968 are fundamental to understanding the Court's powers:

  • Section 1: Establishes the right of appeal against conviction on indictment.

  • Section 2: Defines the circumstances under which the Court may allow an appeal against conviction, focusing on the "safety" of the conviction.

  • Section 11: Grants the Court authority to substitute a conviction for an alternative offence or to quash a sentence and pass a different one.

These provisions create a framework that allows the Court of Appeal to rectify errors and maintain the integrity of the criminal justice system.

Appeals Against Conviction

When an individual believes their conviction is unsound, they may appeal to the Court of Appeal. The Court employs the "safety test" to determine whether the conviction is sound or should be overturned.

The "Safety Test"

Under Section 2(1) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968, the Court of Appeal must consider whether a conviction is unsafe. The term "unsafe" is not explicitly defined in the statute but has been interpreted through case law. In R v Cooper [1969] 1 QB 267, Lord Widgery CJ stated that if the Court, after considering the evidence, concludes that the conviction is unsafe or unsatisfactory, it must be quashed.

The safety test involves assessing factors such as:

  • Procedural Irregularities: Errors in the trial process that may have affected the outcome.

  • Misdirections in Law: Incorrect legal instructions given to the jury.

  • New Evidence: Evidence that was not available at the time of trial but could have influenced the verdict.

Example: Procedural Irregularities

In R v W [2010] EWCA Crim 372, the Court found that significant misdirections during the summing-up to the jury rendered the conviction unsafe. As a result, the conviction was quashed, emphasizing the Court's role in correcting trial errors.

Powers of the Court in Conviction Appeals

If the Court determines that a conviction is unsafe, it has several options:

  1. Quash the Conviction: The conviction is set aside, effectively nullifying it.

  2. Order a Retrial: The case is sent back to the Crown Court for a new trial.

  3. Substitute a Verdict: The Court may substitute the conviction for a lesser offence if appropriate.

  4. Dismiss the Appeal: If the conviction is deemed safe, the appeal is dismissed.

Substituting a Verdict

In R v Giles [2013] EWCA Crim 222, the Court substituted a conviction for manslaughter instead of murder after determining that the requisite intent for murder was not established. This shows the Court's ability to adjust convictions to reflect the appropriate level of guilt.

Fresh Evidence

The admission of new evidence is governed by Section 23 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968. The Court must consider whether:

  • The evidence appears to be credible.

  • It may afford ground for allowing the appeal.

  • It would have been admissible at the original trial.

  • There is a reasonable explanation for the failure to present the evidence at the trial.

In R v Hakopian [2005] EWCA Crim 1430, fresh DNA evidence emerged that contradicted the prosecution's case. The Court admitted the new evidence and, applying the safety test, found the conviction unsafe, leading to its quashing.

Appeals Against Sentence

Beyond convictions, the Court of Appeal also hears appeals against sentences imposed by the Crown Court.

Grounds for Appeal

An appeal against sentence may be made on the basis that the sentence is:

  • Manifestly Excessive: Disproportionately severe relative to the offence.

  • Wrong in Principle: Based on incorrect application of sentencing guidelines or legal principles.

  • Unlawful: Not permitted by law.

Example: Manifestly Excessive Sentence

In R v Harrison [2011] EWCA Crim 1848, the defendant appealed against a custodial sentence for a minor theft. The Court held that a non-custodial sentence would have been appropriate, reducing the sentence accordingly.

Powers of the Court in Sentence Appeals

Under Section 11 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968, the Court has the authority to:

  • Quash any Sentence or Order: Set aside the original sentence.

  • Pass a Different Sentence: Impose a new sentence that could have been passed by the trial court.

  • Dismiss the Appeal: Uphold the original sentence if it is considered appropriate.

Sentencing Principles

The Court follows key principles to ensure fairness:

  • Totality Principle: Ensuring that the total sentence for multiple offences is just and proportionate.

  • Parity Principle: Similar offences committed in similar circumstances should receive similar sentences.

  • Proportionality: The sentence should correspond to the seriousness of the offence and the offender's culpability.

Application of Sentencing Guidelines

In R v Offer [2014] EWCA Crim 360, the Court reviewed the sentencing judge's application of guidelines for drug offences. Finding that the guidelines were misapplied, the Court adjusted the sentence to align with the correct category of offence.

Case Studies

Case Study 1: R v D (Appeal Against Conviction)

In R v D [2017] EWCA Crim 121, the appellant was convicted of robbery based largely on eyewitness testimony. After the conviction, new CCTV footage surfaced, casting doubt on the identification evidence. The Court admitted the fresh evidence and concluded that the conviction was unsafe, demonstrating how new information can significantly impact the outcome of an appeal.

Case Study 2: R v F (Appeal Against Sentence)

In R v F [2018] EWCA Crim 1865, the appellant received a lengthy sentence for a non-violent fraud offence. Arguing that the sentence was manifestly excessive and not in line with comparable cases, the appellant appealed. The Court agreed, emphasizing the importance of the parity principle, and reduced the sentence to reflect sentences imposed in similar cases.

Common Misconceptions

Clarifying misunderstandings about the appeals process helps ensure accurate knowledge:

  • Not an Automatic Right: Appeals require permission (leave) from the Court, demonstrating that there are reasonable grounds.

  • No New Trials: The Court of Appeal reviews the proceedings for legal errors; it does not hear the case anew with witnesses and evidence as in the original trial.

  • Role of Fresh Evidence: New evidence is only admitted under strict conditions and must significantly impact the safety of the conviction.

Interaction with Judicial Review

While the Court of Appeal handles appeals on criminal matters, judicial review is a separate legal process challenging the lawfulness of decisions made by public bodies.

  • Distinct Jurisdictions: Appeals address the outcome of a case, whereas judicial review examines the legality of the decision-making process itself.

  • High Court Jurisdiction: Judicial reviews are conducted in the Administrative Court, a division of the High Court, rather than the Court of Appeal.

  • Exceptional Circumstances: Judicial review is rarely used to challenge decisions of the Court of Appeal due to the principle of finality in litigation.

Conclusion

The Court of Appeal's powers in criminal cases are fundamental to upholding justice and ensuring that legal proceedings follow established principles. Complex concepts such as the safety test, the admission of fresh evidence, and the application of sentencing guidelines interact within the framework of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968. By analyzing statutes and landmark cases, one can understand how the Court exercises its authority to correct errors and uphold the integrity of the legal system. A detailed comprehension of these principles is necessary for understanding the complexities of criminal appeals and for appreciating the mechanisms that protect against wrongful convictions and disproportionate sentences.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Barbri SQE
One-time Fee
$3,800-6,900
BPP SQE
One-time Fee
$5,400-8,200
College of Legal P...
One-time Fee
$2,300-9,100
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350
Law Training Centr...
One-time Fee
$500-6,200
QLTS SQE
One-time Fee
$2,500-3,800
University of Law...
One-time Fee
$6,200-22,400

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of December 2024. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

Practice. Learn. Excel.

Features designed to support your job and test preparation

Question Bank

Access 100,000+ questions that adapt to your performance level and learning style.

Performance Analytics

Track your progress across topics and identify knowledge gaps with comprehensive analytics and insights.

Multi-Assessment Support

Prepare for multiple exams simultaneously, from academic tests to professional certifications.

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal