Impact on estate distribution

Can You Answer This?

Practice with real exam questions

In March 2019, Harriet moved into Alex's home and lived with him continuously until his death in June 2022. She left her employment to care for Alex due to his deteriorating health, relying on him financially. Harriet was not included in Alex's will, which bequeathed his entire estate to his adult son from a prior relationship. Despite cohabitation for over three years, Harriet was not recognized in the relevant legal documents. Under Re Watson [2020] EWHC 999 (Ch), cohabitants who lived together for at least two years may apply for financial provision if they meet certain statutory prerequisites.


Which of the following statements best reflects Harriet's right to claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975?

Introduction

The Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 is a notable statute in English succession law that permits certain individuals to apply to the court for reasonable financial provision from a deceased person's estate. The Act seeks to balance the principle of testamentary freedom with the responsibility to provide for those who were financially dependent on the deceased. It delineates specific categories of eligible applicants and outlines the criteria the courts must consider when adjudicating such claims.

Eligibility Criteria: Who Can Claim?

Under the Act, certain categories of individuals are eligible to apply for reasonable financial provision:

  1. Spouses and Civil Partners: This includes current spouses and civil partners of the deceased. Former spouses or civil partners who have not remarried or entered into a new civil partnership may also claim, provided they have not received a final financial settlement upon divorce or dissolution.

  2. Cohabitants: Individuals who were living in the same household as the deceased, in a relationship akin to marriage or civil partnership, for at least two years immediately before the death.

  3. Children: This encompasses biological children, adopted children, stepchildren, and any person treated by the deceased as a child of the family.

  4. Persons Maintained by the Deceased: Any individual who was being wholly or partly maintained by the deceased immediately before death.

Eligibility alone does not guarantee an award; applicants must demonstrate that the deceased's estate does not make reasonable financial provision for them under the terms of the will or intestacy rules.

Court Considerations: Balancing Interests and Ensuring Fairness

When assessing applications under the Act, the court considers various factors to determine whether reasonable financial provision has been made and, if not, what provision should be made. These factors include:

  1. The Financial Resources and Needs of the Applicant: The court examines the current and foreseeable future financial resources and needs of the applicant, including income, assets, earning capacity, and financial obligations.

  2. The Financial Resources and Needs of Other Applicants and Beneficiaries: The financial circumstances of other applicants and beneficiaries under the will or intestacy are also considered.

  3. Obligations and Responsibilities of the Deceased: The extent to which the deceased had obligations or responsibilities towards any applicant or beneficiary.

  4. The Size and Nature of the Estate: The total value and composition of the estate, which may affect the court's ability to provide for applicants.

  5. Any Physical or Mental Disability: Any physical or mental disability of the applicant or any beneficiary is taken into account.

  6. Any Other Relevant Matter, Including Conduct: The court may consider any other matter it deems relevant, which may include the conduct of the applicant or any other person.

In applications by spouses or civil partners, the court may also consider the standard of provision that the applicant might have expected upon divorce or dissolution, often referred to as the 'divorce cross-check.'

The Claims Process and Procedural Steps

The process for making a claim under the Act involves several key steps:

  1. Time Limit: Claims must generally be made within six months from the date of the grant of probate or letters of administration. The court may grant permission to apply out of time in exceptional circumstances.

  2. Pre-Action Protocol: Compliance with the relevant pre-action protocol is important to encourage early exchange of information and potential settlement.

  3. Application to the Court: The applicant must file a claim form setting out the grounds of the claim and the relief sought.

  4. Interim Provision: The court has the power to make interim orders for financial provision pending the final determination of the application.

  5. Negotiation and Mediation: Alternative dispute resolution methods are encouraged to resolve claims without the need for a contested hearing.

  6. Court Hearing: If the matter cannot be resolved, it proceeds to a court hearing where evidence is presented, and the court determines the outcome.

Powers of the Court and Types of Orders

Under the Act, the court has broad powers to make orders to provide reasonable financial provision to successful applicants. These orders can include:

  1. Periodic Payments: Orders for regular payments out of the estate, providing ongoing financial support.

  2. Lump Sum Payments: Orders for one-off payments of a specified amount from the estate.

  3. Transfer or Settlement of Property: Orders requiring that specified property be transferred to the applicant, or that property be held in trust for their benefit.

  4. Acquisition of Property for the Applicant: Orders directing that property be purchased for the applicant using estate funds.

  5. Variation of Ante-Nuptial or Post-Nuptial Settlements: In the case of spouses or civil partners, the court may alter the terms of marital or civil partnership settlements.

These powers enable the court to tailor the provision to the specific needs and circumstances of the applicant and the estate.

Notable Legal Precedents

Several key cases have shaped the interpretation and application of the Act:

  • Ilott v The Blue Cross and Others [2017] UKSC 17: In this landmark case, the Supreme Court considered the principles governing adult child claims under the Act. The court upheld the importance of testamentary freedom but recognized that reasonable financial provision may be appropriate in certain circumstances, particularly where the applicant has a need for maintenance.

  • Re Coventry [1980] Ch 461: This case established guidelines on balancing the competing interests of applicants and beneficiaries, emphasizing that claims must be assessed in the context of the estate's size and the deceased's obligations.

  • Re Hancock [1998] 2 FLR 346: The court in this case considered the extent to which a cohabitant could claim when they had been maintained by the deceased, highlighting the importance of demonstrating actual dependency.

These precedents provide important guidance on how courts interpret the Act and the factors that may influence their decisions.

Illustrative Case Studies

The following hypothetical scenarios illustrate the application of the Act:

  1. The Adult Dependent Child: An adult child who, due to disability or other special circumstances, was financially dependent on the deceased but was left little or nothing in the will may apply for reasonable financial provision.

  2. The Cohabiting Partner: A partner who lived with the deceased for three years in a stable relationship akin to marriage but was not provided for in the will may seek provision under the Act.

  3. The Former Spouse Without a Financial Settlement: A divorced spouse who did not receive a financial settlement upon divorce and has not remarried may claim if excluded from the will.

Impact on Estate Planning and Administration

The Act has significant implications for both estate planning and administration:

  1. Testamentary Freedom and Its Limits: While individuals have the freedom to dispose of their estate as they wish, the Act imposes statutory limitations to protect those who might otherwise be left without reasonable provision.

  2. Risk Management in Estate Planning: Legal practitioners must consider potential claims under the Act when advising clients, particularly in circumstances where potential applicants are being excluded or receive reduced provision.

  3. Use of Letters of Wishes: Although not legally binding, letters of wishes can explain the testator's reasons for their decisions, potentially influencing the court's assessment of any claims.

  4. Delay in Estate Distribution: Personal representatives may need to delay distributing the estate until the time limit for claims has expired to avoid personal liability.

  5. Tax Implications: Orders made under the Act may impact inheritance tax liabilities for the estate and beneficiaries.

Conclusion

The Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 plays a fundamental role in modifying estate distribution by enabling courts to make reasonable financial provision for eligible individuals. The court's discretion to balance testamentary freedom with the needs of dependants can significantly alter the intended distribution under a will or the intestacy rules. The Act specifies categories of eligible applicants and mandates the courts to consider detailed factors relating to the applicant's and beneficiaries' financial circumstances, the deceased's obligations, and the nature of the estate.

For example, a cohabitant who was in a substantial relationship with the deceased but was excluded from the will may successfully claim for financial provision, impacting the shares of other beneficiaries. Similarly, an adult child who was financially dependent due to a disability may receive provision despite being omitted from the will.

Understanding the interplay between eligibility, court considerations, and the types of orders available under the Act is essential for practitioners and those involved in estate planning and administration. The Act's influence necessitates careful drafting of wills and proactive estate planning strategies to address potential claims, ensuring that the testator's wishes are fulfilled as closely as possible within the legal framework.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Barbri SQE
One-time Fee
$3,800-6,900
BPP SQE
One-time Fee
$5,400-8,200
College of Legal P...
One-time Fee
$2,300-9,100
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350
Law Training Centr...
One-time Fee
$500-6,200
QLTS SQE
One-time Fee
$2,500-3,800
University of Law...
One-time Fee
$6,200-22,400

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of December 2024. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

Practice. Learn. Excel.

Features designed to support your job and test preparation

Question Bank

Access 100,000+ questions that adapt to your performance level and learning style.

Performance Analytics

Track your progress across topics and identify knowledge gaps with comprehensive analytics and insights.

Multi-Assessment Support

Prepare for multiple exams simultaneously, from academic tests to professional certifications.

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal