Introduction
The failure of gifts in wills arises when the intended distribution of a testator's assets cannot be executed as specified, due to legal deficiencies or events that invalidate those provisions. Key factors leading to such failures include uncertainty in the terms of the will, where the subject matter or beneficiaries are not clearly defined; instances where a beneficiary acts as a witness to the will's execution, contravening statutory regulations; and the effects of divorce on testamentary gifts to former spouses. Understanding these principles is essential to ensuring that wills are interpreted and administered in accordance with the testator's true intentions within the legal framework.
Uncertainty in Wills
Uncertainty in wills occurs when the language used in the testamentary document is ambiguous or lacks sufficient clarity, making it difficult to ascertain the testator's intentions. This can lead to the failure of gifts due to the inability to enforce the provisions as written. There are three primary types of uncertainty recognized in legal contexts: subject matter uncertainty, object uncertainty, and administrative unworkability.
Types of Uncertainty
-
Subject Matter Uncertainty: This arises when the assets or property intended to be gifted are not clearly identified. For example, a clause in a will that leaves "some of my valuable possessions" to a beneficiary lacks specificity, making it unclear which items are included. In Palmer v Simmonds (1854) 2 Drew 221, a gift of "the bulk of my residuary estate" was deemed too uncertain to be enforceable.
-
Object Uncertainty: This pertains to ambiguity regarding the beneficiaries who are to receive gifts. If the description of beneficiaries is too vague, such as leaving assets "to my friends," it becomes challenging to determine who qualifies. The case of Re Baden's Deed Trusts (No 2) [1973] Ch 9 addressed this issue by considering whether the class of beneficiaries could be ascertained with sufficient certainty.
-
Administrative Unworkability: This occurs when the terms of the will are so broad that it becomes impractical to carry out the testator's instructions. For instance, directing trustees to distribute assets among "all the residents of London" would be administratively unfeasible. In R v District Auditor ex parte West Yorkshire Metropolitan County Council [1986] RVR 24, a trust for the benefit of "the inhabitants of the County of West Yorkshire" was held invalid due to administrative unworkability.
Legal Guidelines
Courts strive to uphold the testator's intentions wherever possible, employing rules of construction to interpret ambiguous provisions. The principle established in Marley v Rawlings [2014] UKSC 2 emphasizes a purposive approach, allowing the correction of obvious mistakes if the testator's true intentions can be discerned from the will itself. However, the courts cannot rewrite the will but may admit extrinsic evidence under Section 21 of the Administration of Justice Act 1982 to resolve ambiguities.
Example
Consider a testator who leaves "a reasonable sum" to a named beneficiary without specifying the amount. This lack of clarity could render the gift invalid due to subject matter uncertainty. However, the court may interpret "reasonable sum" by considering the overall context of the will and the circumstances surrounding its creation, provided that sufficient guidance is available.
Beneficiary as Witness
Under the Wills Act 1837, certain formalities must be observed for a will to be valid. One critical requirement is that the will must be signed by the testator in the presence of at least two witnesses, who then attest and sign the will. Section 15 of the Act stipulates that if a beneficiary (or their spouse or civil partner) witnesses the will, any gift to that beneficiary becomes void, although the rest of the will remains valid.
Statutory Framework
- Section 15, Wills Act 1837: A gift to a person (or their spouse or civil partner) who attests the execution of a will is void.
- Purpose: This provision aims to prevent undue influence and ensure the integrity of the witnessing process by eliminating any personal gain for witnesses.
Exceptions and Considerations
- Creditors and Executors: A creditor who witnesses a will can still benefit from the repayment of debts specified in the will. Similarly, an executor who is not a beneficiary may witness the will without invalidating their appointment.
- Gifts Saved by Section 1 of the Wills Act 1968: In limited circumstances, where the will has been prepared by a solicitor and the attesting beneficiary receives no greater benefit than they would under intestacy, the gift may be upheld.
- Awareness Irrelevant: The witness's knowledge of their beneficiary status is not a factor; the gift is void regardless of intent or awareness.
Case Law
In Re Bravda, decd [1968] 1 WLR 278, a beneficiary who witnessed the will was unable to receive their gift, reinforcing the strict application of Section 15. The courts have consistently upheld this rule to maintain the validity of the witnessing process.
Example
Suppose a testator asks their adult child to witness the signing of their will, which includes a gift to that child. Despite the familial trust, the gift to the child would be void under Section 15. The remainder of the will would still be effective, but the intended gift to the child would fail, potentially resulting in unintended consequences for the distribution of the estate.
Divorce and Its Effects on Wills
When a testator divorces after making a will, the law adjusts the will's provisions concerning the former spouse. Section 18A of the Wills Act 1837 provides that any clause in a will that benefits a former spouse is revoked upon divorce, unless the will expressly states otherwise.
Statutory Provisions
- Section 18A, Wills Act 1837: On the dissolution or annulment of a marriage or civil partnership, any disposition to the former spouse, any appointment of them as executor or trustee, and any grant of a power to the former spouse are revoked, as if they had predeceased the testator.
- Exceptions: If the will contains a contrary intention, explicitly stating that the provisions are to remain effective despite divorce, then the clauses remain valid.
Impact on the Will
- Revocation of Gifts: Any gifts or bequests to the former spouse are automatically revoked upon divorce.
- Role as Executor or Trustee: The former spouse is deemed to have predeceased the testator in relation to any appointments, and alternative provisions in the will may take effect.
- Partial Revocation: The revocation applies only to the provisions concerning the former spouse; the rest of the will remains valid.
Judicial Interpretation
In Re Sinclair [1985] 1 WLR 310, the court considered the effect of divorce on wills and affirmed that the statutory provisions apply strictly. The former spouse cannot benefit from the will unless the testator makes a new will or codicil after the divorce, reinstating the gifts.
Example
A testator creates a will leaving their entire estate to their spouse. After the couple divorces, the testator does not update the will and later passes away. Under Section 18A, the gift to the former spouse is revoked. If there is no residuary clause or alternative beneficiaries specified, the estate would be distributed according to the rules of intestacy, which may lead to unintended recipients inheriting the estate.
Conclusion
The interplay of uncertainty in wills, beneficiaries acting as witnesses, and the impact of divorce can collectively lead to the failure of testamentary gifts, highlighting the importance of precise drafting and adherence to statutory formalities. For instance, consider a testator who, prior to divorcing, drafts a will leaving "a substantial portion of my estate" to their spouse, who also acts as a witness to the will. The use of the term "a substantial portion" introduces subject matter uncertainty due to its vagueness. Additionally, the spouse witnessing the will triggers Section 15 of the Wills Act 1837, rendering any gift to them void. Upon divorce, Section 18A further revokes any dispositions to the former spouse. In this scenario, the cumulative effect of ambiguity, invalid witnessing, and divorce leads to the failure of the intended gift, potentially resulting in the estate being distributed contrary to the testator's wishes. To avoid such outcomes, it is imperative to use clear and unambiguous language, ensure that beneficiaries do not witness the will, and update testamentary documents following significant life events such as divorce. Legal professionals must meticulously apply these principles to safeguard the testator's intentions and uphold the validity of the will in accordance with established statutes and case law.