Overview of intestacy

Can You Answer This?

Practice with real exam questions

Michael recently passed away without leaving a will, prompting questions about how his estate should be distributed. He was survived by his spouse Linda, his biological daughter Sarah from a previous relationship, his adopted niece Olivia, and a step-son Logan who was never legally adopted. The estate, valued at £520,000, includes various personal belongings and real property. Linda insists that she should inherit the entire estate because Michael verbally expressed his intention to provide for her. In contrast, Sarah and Olivia both believe they are entitled to a share, while Logan remains unsure of his rights.


Which of the following statements best reflects the correct distribution of his estate under the intestacy rules of England and Wales?

Overview

Intestacy rules determine how a deceased person's estate is distributed when there is no valid will. These statutory provisions create a predetermined order of inheritance, ensuring that the estate is allocated among surviving relatives according to legal guidelines. Understanding the intestacy framework is important for dealing with issues related to succession, property rights, and family law within England and Wales.

Legal Framework of Intestacy Rules

Statutory Basis

In England and Wales, the intestacy rules are primarily set out in the Administration of Estates Act 1925, which has been amended by subsequent legislation such as the Inheritance and Trustees' Powers Act 2014. These statutes outline how the estate of a person who dies intestate—that is, without a valid will—is to be distributed among surviving relatives. The laws aim to reflect a presumed intention of the average person, providing a default scheme that dictates who inherits and in what proportions.

Distribution Hierarchy

The intestacy rules are structured like a ladder, with each rung representing a level of relatives who may inherit. At the top rung stands the surviving spouse or civil partner, followed by children and their descendants on the next rung. The hierarchy proceeds as follows:

  1. Surviving spouse or civil partner
  2. Children and their descendants
  3. Parents
  4. Siblings of the whole blood, then half-blood siblings
  5. Grandparents
  6. Aunts and uncles (whole blood), then half-blood relatives
  7. The Crown, Duchy of Lancaster, or Duke of Cornwall (if no relatives exist)

This sequence determines the order of inheritance, and only when there are no relatives in a preceding category does the estate pass to the next.

Detailed Applications of Intestacy Rules

Statutory Legacy and Personal Chattels

When someone dies leaving a spouse or civil partner and children, the intestacy rules specify how the estate is divided. The surviving spouse or civil partner is entitled to:

  • All of the deceased's personal chattels (personal belongings)
  • A statutory legacy, which is a fixed sum currently set at £270,000 (as of February 2020)
  • Half of the remaining estate

The other half of the remaining estate is divided among the deceased's children.

To illustrate, consider this example:

Suppose Emily dies intestate, leaving behind a husband, James, and two children, Lily and Noah. Her estate is valued at £500,000. James would receive:

  • All of Emily's personal belongings (e.g., jewelry, car, furniture)
  • The statutory legacy of £270,000
  • Half of the remaining estate:
    • Remaining estate after statutory legacy: £500,000 - £270,000 = £230,000
    • Half of remaining estate to James: £230,000 / 2 = £115,000

James receives a total of £385,000 (£270,000 + £115,000), and the remaining £115,000 is divided equally between Lily and Noah, giving them £57,500 each.

Per Stirpes Distribution

The intestacy rules follow the principle of per stirpes distribution, which ensures that a deceased person's estate is divided equally among branches of the family. This principle is important when a direct descendant, such as a child, has predeceased the intestate person but leaves children of their own.

Let's clarify this with an example:

Suppose John passes away without a will. He had two children, Anna and Brian. Sadly, Anna died before John but left behind two children, Chloe and David (John's grandchildren). Under the intestacy rules:

  • Brian receives half of John's estate.
  • The other half, which would have gone to Anna, is now divided equally between her children, Chloe and David.
    • Chloe receives a quarter of the estate.
    • David receives a quarter of the estate.

This method ensures that Anna's branch of the family is not disadvantaged due to her prior passing.

Partial Intestacy

Partial intestacy occurs when a person leaves a valid will, but the will does not dispose of their entire estate. This can happen if the will fails to include certain assets or if a gift in the will lapses because the beneficiary predeceased the testator and no alternative provision is made.

Consider the case of Sarah, who writes a will leaving her house to her sister and £50,000 to a charity but does not mention the rest of her assets, which include £100,000 in savings and investments. Since Sarah's will does not cover her entire estate, the unmentioned assets fall under the intestacy rules. Consequently, the £100,000 will be distributed according to the statutory hierarchy, potentially resulting in beneficiaries Sarah did not intend to inherit.

Special Considerations in Intestacy

Adopted and Non-Marital Children

Under current law, all children are treated equally under intestacy rules, regardless of whether they were born within a marriage or adopted. The Family Law Reform Act 1987 removed distinctions between legitimate and illegitimate children for inheritance purposes. Adopted children inherit from their adoptive parents as if they were biological children but do not inherit from their biological parents under intestacy.

However, step-children are not included in the intestacy provisions unless they have been legally adopted by the deceased. This means that a step-child could be left without any inheritance unless specific provisions are made through a valid will.

For example:

Suppose Margaret dies intestate, leaving behind two biological children, Oliver and Sophia, and a step-son, Ethan, whom she raised but did not legally adopt. Under the intestacy rules:

  • Oliver and Sophia inherit Margaret's estate equally.
  • Ethan is not entitled to any share under intestacy.

This situation highlights the importance of understanding how intestacy affects different family relationships.

The 28-Day Rule

In intestacy, a beneficiary must survive the deceased by at least 28 days to inherit. This rule prevents the estate from passing through multiple estates in quick succession, which could complicate the distribution and increase administrative burdens.

Consider a tragic scenario where both spouses, Michael and Laura, are involved in an accident. Michael dies immediately, and Laura passes away 20 days later without regaining consciousness. Since Laura did not survive Michael by the required 28 days, she is treated as having predeceased him for inheritance purposes. Consequently:

  • Michael's estate is distributed to his next eligible relatives under the intestacy hierarchy.
  • Laura's estate is distributed separately to her relatives, without the inclusion of any inheritance from Michael.

This rule can significantly affect how estates are ultimately allocated among surviving family members.

Comparative Intestacy: Different Jurisdictions

England & Wales vs. Scotland

While the intestacy rules in England and Wales share similarities with those in Scotland, notable differences reflect each jurisdiction's legal traditions.

In Scotland, the surviving spouse's rights are ensured by "prior rights" and "legal rights." Prior rights entitle the spouse to:

  • The deceased's dwelling house (up to a certain value)
  • Furnishings and furniture (up to a certain value)
  • A fixed sum of money from the estate

Legal rights give the spouse and children a claim on the movable estate (assets other than land and buildings), which cannot be overridden by a will.

For example:

Even if a Scottish decedent attempted to disinherit their children through a will, the children would still be entitled to claim legal rights against the movable estate, ensuring they receive a portion of the inheritance.

International Approaches

In contrast to common law jurisdictions, many civil law countries enforce "forced heirship" rules that restrict the testator's freedom to distribute their estate entirely as they wish. In France, for instance, a significant portion of the estate must be reserved for children, regardless of the contents of a will. This means the concept of total testamentary freedom is limited, protecting certain heirs from disinheritance.

Conclusion

Complex scenarios in intestacy often require a thorough application of multiple principles simultaneously. For instance, consider a case where an individual dies intestate after partially distributing their estate through a non-comprehensive will, resulting in partial intestacy. Suppose the deceased had a spouse, adopted children, step-children, and descendants of a predeceased child. The application of the intestacy rules must account for the statutory hierarchy, per stirpes distribution, and special considerations for adopted and step-children.

Under the Administration of Estates Act 1925, the estate not covered by the will falls under intestacy provisions. The surviving spouse is entitled to personal chattels, the statutory legacy, and a share of the residual estate. Adopted children are treated as biological children under the Family Law Reform Act 1987 and are eligible to inherit, whereas step-children, absent legal adoption, are not entitled under intestacy.

Furthermore, the per stirpes principle dictates that if a child of the deceased predeceased them but left descendants, those descendants inherit their parent's share. The 28-day survivorship rule requires beneficiaries to outlive the deceased by 28 days to inherit. Failure to meet this condition affects the distribution of the estate and may alter which relatives are entitled.

Applying these interconnected rules ensures that the estate is distributed in accordance with statutory requirements. Legal practitioners must meticulously analyze each component—partial intestacy, the statutory hierarchy, per stirpes distribution, and survivorship rules—to determine the rightful beneficiaries. Accurate application of these principles is required for correct administration of intestate estates within the legal framework established by the relevant statutes.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Barbri SQE
One-time Fee
$3,800-6,900
BPP SQE
One-time Fee
$5,400-8,200
College of Legal P...
One-time Fee
$2,300-9,100
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350
Law Training Centr...
One-time Fee
$500-6,200
QLTS SQE
One-time Fee
$2,500-3,800
University of Law...
One-time Fee
$6,200-22,400

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of December 2024. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

Practice. Learn. Excel.

Features designed to support your job and test preparation

Question Bank

Access 100,000+ questions that adapt to your performance level and learning style.

Performance Analytics

Track your progress across topics and identify knowledge gaps with comprehensive analytics and insights.

Multi-Assessment Support

Prepare for multiple exams simultaneously, from academic tests to professional certifications.

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal