Types of trusts: express, implied, resulting, constructive, and charitable

Can You Answer This?

Practice with real exam questions

Natasha invests £40,000 in her friend Oliver’s newly purchased home, but they never formalize any written agreement. The property is registered solely in Oliver’s name, and Oliver insists Natasha’s payment was a gift. Natasha maintains they had a verbal arrangement that she would share any increase in the home’s value. Over the next two years, she contributes monthly to the mortgage and finances significant renovations, believing she will be recognized as an equal co-owner. Both parties now seek legal guidance as they have fallen into dispute over Natasha’s claim to a beneficial interest in the property.


Which of the following is the best legal explanation for how a court might grant Natasha a beneficial interest in the property?

Introduction

A trust is a legal arrangement wherein one party, the trustee, holds property for the benefit of another, the beneficiary. In English property law, trusts are fundamental mechanisms governing the management and distribution of assets. The core principles of trust law require certainty of intention, subject matter, and objects, as established in Knight v Knight (1840) 3 Beav 148. Trusts are categorized into various types: express, implied, resulting, constructive, and charitable trusts, each with specific requirements and legal implications.

Express Trusts

Express trusts are intentionally created by a settlor who transfers property to a trustee for the benefit of specified beneficiaries. This deliberate act requires compliance with formal legal requirements and reflects the settlor's clear intent.

Key Principles

  • Intention: There must be a definitive intention to create a trust.
  • Three Certainties: The trust must satisfy the certainties of intention, subject matter, and objects.
  • Formalities: Trusts involving land must comply with the Law of Property Act 1925, section 53(1)(b), requiring written evidence signed by the person declaring the trust.

Types of Express Trusts

  • Fixed Trusts: Beneficiaries' interests are clearly defined.
  • Discretionary Trusts: Trustees have discretion over how to distribute income or capital among beneficiaries.
  • Protective Trusts: Designed to safeguard beneficiaries' interests from creditors or adverse situations.

Example

A parent sets up a trust stating, "I leave £500,000 to my trustees to hold for my children equally upon reaching the age of 25." This arrangement forms an express fixed trust, satisfying the three certainties:

  • Certainty of Intention: The parent's clear intention to create a trust.
  • Certainty of Subject Matter: The specific sum of £500,000.
  • Certainty of Objects: The identified beneficiaries—the children.

Implied Trusts

Implied trusts arise without explicit declaration, based on the conduct or circumstances of the parties. They are established by law to reflect presumed intentions or to prevent unjust outcomes.

Key Principles

  • Arising by Operation of Law: Not created by express intent but inferred by courts from the facts.
  • No Formal Requirements: Under section 53(2) of the Law of Property Act 1925, implied trusts do not require written formalities.

Application

Implied trusts are significant when parties haven't formalized their intentions regarding property ownership. For example, cohabiting couples who jointly contribute to a property may find that an implied trust reflects their shared interests, even without an express trust.

Example

Consider Sarah and Michael purchasing a home together, with both contributing to mortgage payments and household expenses. The property is registered solely in Michael's name. Although there's no express trust, their joint contributions and conduct may lead a court to recognize an implied trust, acknowledging Sarah's beneficial interest.

Resulting Trusts

Resulting trusts occur when it's presumed that the transferor did not intend to give the transferee full beneficial ownership. The beneficial interest "results" back to the transferor or their estate.

Key Principles

  • Automatic Resulting Trusts: Arise when an express trust fails or doesn't dispose of all the beneficial interest.
  • Presumed Resulting Trusts: Occur when someone contributes to the purchase price of property held in another's name without an express declaration.

Requirements

  • Contribution to Purchase Price: Must be at the time of acquisition.
  • No Contrary Intention: There's no evidence the contribution was a gift or loan.

Example

Alice and Bob purchase a property for £200,000. Alice contributes £60,000 towards the purchase price, and the property is registered in Bob's name. Without an express trust, a presumed resulting trust arises, granting Alice a 30% beneficial interest corresponding to her contribution.

Limitations

Resulting trusts focus solely on financial contributions at the time of purchase. They don't account for later contributions or non-financial efforts like renovations or household management.

Constructive Trusts

Constructive trusts are imposed by courts to prevent unjust enrichment when one party wrongfully holds property that should benefit another. They address situations where enforcing strict legal titles would result in inequity.

Key Principles

  • Unconscionability: It would be unjust for the legal owner to retain full ownership.
  • Common Intention and Detriment: Requires a shared intention and actions taken in reliance, leading to detriment.

Requirements

  • Evidence of Common Intention: Through express agreements or inferred from conduct.
  • Detrimental Reliance: The claimant acted to their detriment based on the shared intention.

Case Law

  • Lloyds Bank plc v Rosset [1991] 1 AC 107 established strict criteria for inferring common intention.
  • Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17 considered the entire course of conduct between parties.
  • Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53 allowed courts to impute intentions based on fairness.

Example

Emma and Daniel live together in a house registered in Daniel's name. Emma contributes to mortgage payments and significant renovations. Their conduct suggests a shared intention of ownership. A constructive trust may be imposed, granting Emma a beneficial interest due to her detrimental reliance on their shared intention.

Charitable Trusts

Charitable trusts are established for purposes recognized as charitable under the law, benefiting the public or a substantial segment of it.

Key Principles

  • Charitable Purposes: Defined in the Charities Act 2011, including relief of poverty, advancement of education, and promotion of health.
  • Public Benefit: Must confer a tangible benefit to the public.

Requirements

  • Exclusively Charitable: All purposes must be charitable.
  • Compliance with Legal Framework: Must follow the Charities Act 2011 provisions.

Case Law

Independent Schools Council v Charity Commission for England and Wales [2012] UKUT 421 (TCC) clarified the public benefit requirement, emphasizing that charitable trusts must provide more than incidental private benefits.

Conclusion

Constructive trusts represent some of the most complex interactions within trust law. They are imposed to address situations where the rigid application of legal ownership would result in unfairness. Understanding their principles involves analyzing case law and equitable doctrines, focusing on common intention and detrimental reliance.

Resulting and constructive trusts often interact, especially in disputes over family homes. For instance, where one party contributes to the purchase price (leading to a resulting trust) and both parties share an intention of joint ownership with subsequent contributions (resulting in a constructive trust), courts assess both to determine equitable interests.

Each type of trust—express, implied, resulting, constructive, and charitable—has specific requirements but can overlap in practical scenarios. For example, in the absence of an express trust, implied trusts provide mechanisms to recognize parties' interests based on contributions and intentions.

A thorough understanding of these trusts is essential for understanding English property law. Recognizing how they function together enables a comprehensive approach to legal analysis and application, ensuring that equitable outcomes are achieved in complex property arrangements.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Barbri SQE
One-time Fee
$3,800-6,900
BPP SQE
One-time Fee
$5,400-8,200
College of Legal P...
One-time Fee
$2,300-9,100
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350
Law Training Centr...
One-time Fee
$500-6,200
QLTS SQE
One-time Fee
$2,500-3,800
University of Law...
One-time Fee
$6,200-22,400

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of December 2024. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

Practice. Learn. Excel.

Features designed to support your job and test preparation

Question Bank

Access 100,000+ questions that adapt to your performance level and learning style.

Performance Analytics

Track your progress across topics and identify knowledge gaps with comprehensive analytics and insights.

Multi-Assessment Support

Prepare for multiple exams simultaneously, from academic tests to professional certifications.

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal