Sentencing - Newton hearings

Learning Outcomes

After reading this article, you should be able to understand and explain:

  • The circumstances in which a Newton hearing becomes necessary following a guilty plea.
  • The purpose of a Newton hearing within the sentencing process.
  • The key procedural aspects of a Newton hearing, including the roles of the prosecution, defence, and judge.
  • The burden and standard of proof applicable during a Newton hearing.
  • The potential impact of the findings of a Newton hearing on the final sentence imposed.

SQE1 Syllabus

For SQE1, you are required to understand the principles and procedures related to sentencing, including how factual disputes are resolved post-guilty plea.

As you work through this article, remember to pay particular attention in your revision to:

  • When a Newton hearing is required following a guilty plea.
  • The procedure adopted during a Newton hearing.
  • The burden and standard of proof during the hearing.
  • The consequences of the court’s findings of fact on the sentencing decision, including potential loss of credit for the guilty plea.

Test Your Knowledge

Attempt these questions before reading this article. If you find some difficult or cannot remember the answers, remember to look more closely at that area during your revision.

  1. In which situation is a Newton hearing most likely to be required?
    1. When a defendant pleads not guilty and disputes the prosecution's evidence.
    2. When a defendant pleads guilty but disagrees with the prosecution about facts affecting the seriousness of the offence.
    3. When the prosecution wishes to introduce new evidence after conviction.
    4. When the defence wishes to appeal against the sentence imposed.
  2. Who bears the burden of proof in a Newton hearing regarding disputed aggravating facts?
    1. The defendant, on the balance of probabilities.
    2. The prosecution, on the balance of probabilities.
    3. The defendant, beyond reasonable doubt.
    4. The prosecution, beyond reasonable doubt.

  3. True or False: A Newton hearing is conducted before a jury.

  4. What is the primary purpose of a Newton hearing?
    1. To determine the defendant's guilt or innocence.
    2. To decide on the admissibility of evidence.
    3. To establish the correct factual basis for sentencing.
    4. To hear mitigation from the defendant.

Introduction

When a defendant pleads guilty to an offence, the court usually proceeds directly to sentencing based on the agreed facts. However, situations arise where, despite the guilty plea, there is a significant disagreement between the prosecution and the defence regarding the factual circumstances surrounding the offence. These factual disputes can materially affect the appropriate sentence. For instance, the defence might accept that an assault occurred but deny the prosecution's assertion that a weapon was used. Such a dispute requires resolution before the court can pass a just sentence. The procedure used by the court to resolve these factual disagreements after a guilty plea is known as a Newton hearing, originating from the case of R v Newton (1983) 77 Cr App R 13. This article examines the purpose, procedure, and implications of Newton hearings in the sentencing process.

When is a Newton Hearing Necessary?

A Newton hearing is not required in every case where there is a factual dispute following a guilty plea. The court will only convene a Newton hearing if the factual dispute is significant enough to make a material difference to the sentence imposed.

Key Term: Factual Dispute A disagreement between the prosecution and the defence regarding specific facts relating to the commission of an offence after a guilty plea has been entered.

If the factual difference between the prosecution's version and the defendant's version would not affect the sentence (for example, if both versions fall within the same sentencing bracket or category under the relevant Sentencing Guideline), the court may decide it is unnecessary to hold a Newton hearing and may sentence based on the defence's version of events or conclude the dispute is immaterial.

However, where the disparity is significant – for example, affecting the categorisation of harm or culpability under sentencing guidelines, or determining whether a statutory aggravating factor applies – a Newton hearing will likely be necessary to establish the facts upon which sentence will be based.

Key Term: Newton Hearing A procedure held after a defendant pleads guilty but where there is a material dispute about the facts of the offence, which the court needs to resolve before passing sentence.

The decision to hold a Newton hearing rests with the judge. The judge will consider whether the dispute is substantial and whether resolving it is essential for determining the appropriate sentence level.

The Basis of Plea

When a defendant intends to plead guilty but disputes the prosecution's version of the facts, the defence will typically submit a written 'basis of plea' to the prosecution and the court.

Key Term: Basis of Plea A written document submitted by the defence outlining the factual version of events upon which the defendant pleads guilty, particularly where this differs from the prosecution's account.

The prosecution will review the basis of plea. If the prosecution accepts the defendant's version, sentencing proceeds on that basis. If the prosecution rejects the basis of plea, and the factual dispute is material to sentence, the judge will likely order a Newton hearing.

Procedure in a Newton Hearing

A Newton hearing resembles a mini-trial concerning the disputed factual issues, but it takes place after the guilty plea has been entered. The key procedural aspects are:

  1. Tribunal: The hearing is conducted by a judge sitting alone (or magistrates in the Magistrates' Court). There is no jury involved, as the defendant's guilt is not in question, only the factual circumstances surrounding the offence.
  2. Evidence: Both the prosecution and defence may call witnesses and present evidence relevant only to the disputed facts. This evidence is tested through examination-in-chief, cross-examination, and re-examination.
  3. Burden and Standard of Proof: The prosecution bears the burden of proving its version of the disputed facts. The standard of proof is beyond reasonable doubt. If the court is not satisfied to this standard that the prosecution's version is correct, it must sentence on the basis of the defence's version.
  4. Determination: The judge (or magistrates) makes findings of fact on the disputed issues based on the evidence presented.

Worked Example 1.1

David pleads guilty to Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm (ABH). The prosecution alleges David kicked the victim repeatedly while they were on the ground (a fact that would significantly increase the sentence). David admits punching the victim once, causing the injury, but denies any kicking. He submits a basis of plea reflecting this. The prosecution does not accept David's basis of plea.

How should the court proceed?

Answer: Because the dispute (kicking vs. no kicking) is material to the seriousness of the offence and thus the sentence, the court is likely to order a Newton hearing. The prosecution would need to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the kicking occurred. If the court finds the kicking is proven, David will be sentenced on that basis. If not, he will be sentenced based on his version (a single punch).

Impact on Sentencing

The findings of fact made by the judge following a Newton hearing form the definitive basis upon which the sentence is determined. This can significantly impact the sentence in several ways:

  • Sentencing Guidelines: The findings will influence the assessment of harm and culpability under the relevant Sentencing Council guidelines, potentially moving the offence into a higher or lower category and thus altering the starting point and range for the sentence.
  • Aggravating/Mitigating Factors: The hearing determines the presence or absence of disputed aggravating or mitigating factors (e.g., use of a weapon, level of provocation).
  • Credit for Guilty Plea: A defendant normally receives credit (a reduction in sentence) for pleading guilty. However, if a Newton hearing is held and the defendant's version of events is rejected by the court, they are likely to lose some or all of the credit they would otherwise have received for their guilty plea. This reflects the fact that the prosecution has still had to prove a significant part of its case.

Exam Warning

Remember that the burden of proof in a Newton hearing rests squarely on the prosecution to prove their version of the disputed facts beyond reasonable doubt. The defendant does not have to prove their version. Failure by the prosecution to meet this standard means the court must accept the defendant's account for sentencing purposes.

Revision Tip

When analysing a scenario involving a guilty plea, always check if there is any mention of a factual dispute between the parties. If so, consider whether this dispute is material to the sentence. If it is, a Newton hearing is the likely procedure, and you should consider the burden/standard of proof and the potential sentencing implications.

Key Point Checklist

This article has covered the following key knowledge points:

  • A Newton hearing is held after a guilty plea to resolve a material factual dispute relevant to sentencing.
  • The hearing is conducted by a judge or magistrates alone, without a jury.
  • The prosecution must prove its version of the disputed facts beyond reasonable doubt.
  • The defence may submit a basis of plea outlining their version of the facts.
  • The court's findings of fact following the hearing form the basis for sentencing.
  • The outcome affects the application of sentencing guidelines, aggravating/mitigating factors, and credit for the guilty plea.
  • A defendant may lose credit for their guilty plea if their basis of plea is rejected after a Newton hearing.

Key Terms and Concepts

  • Factual Dispute
  • Newton Hearing
  • Basis of Plea
The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Barbri SQE
One-time Fee
$3,800-6,900
BPP SQE
One-time Fee
$5,400-8,200
College of Legal P...
One-time Fee
$2,300-9,100
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350
Law Training Centr...
One-time Fee
$500-6,200
QLTS SQE
One-time Fee
$2,500-3,800
University of Law...
One-time Fee
$6,200-22,400

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal