Sentencing - Role of sentencing guidelines

Learning Outcomes

After reading this article, you will be able to explain the statutory basis and purpose of sentencing guidelines, outline the structured approach courts must follow, identify how aggravating and mitigating factors affect sentencing, and understand when and how courts may depart from the guidelines. You will also be able to apply these principles to SQE1-style scenarios and recognize the importance of consistency and fairness in sentencing decisions.

SQE1 Syllabus

For SQE1, you are required to understand the role and operation of sentencing guidelines in England and Wales. In your revision, focus on:

  • the statutory authority and objectives of sentencing guidelines
  • the structured process for applying guidelines to individual cases
  • the assessment of culpability and harm
  • the impact of aggravating and mitigating factors
  • the principle of judicial discretion and circumstances for departing from guidelines
  • the requirement to provide reasons for sentencing decisions

Test Your Knowledge

Attempt these questions before reading this article. If you find some difficult or cannot remember the answers, remember to look more closely at that area during your revision.

  1. What is the statutory duty of a court regarding sentencing guidelines, and when may a court depart from them?
  2. Name two statutory purposes of sentencing and explain how they influence sentencing decisions.
  3. What are the main steps a court must follow when applying sentencing guidelines to an offence?
  4. Give an example of an aggravating factor and a mitigating factor, and explain their effect on sentence.

Introduction

Sentencing guidelines are structured rules that direct courts in determining sentences for criminal offences in England and Wales. Their main purpose is to ensure consistency, transparency, and fairness in sentencing, while allowing for individual circumstances to be considered. Understanding how these guidelines operate, and the statutory framework behind them, is essential for SQE1.

Statutory Authority and Purposes of Sentencing Guidelines

Sentencing guidelines are given legal force by the Coroners and Justice Act 2009. The Sentencing Council for England and Wales is responsible for preparing and publishing definitive guidelines. Courts are required by law to follow these guidelines unless it would be contrary to the interests of justice to do so.

Key Term: Sentencing guidelines Structured rules issued by the Sentencing Council, which courts must follow when sentencing, unless the interests of justice require otherwise.

Key Term: Sentencing Council The statutory body established to develop and publish sentencing guidelines for England and Wales.

The Sentencing Code (Sentencing Act 2020) consolidates sentencing law and confirms that the purposes of sentencing for adults are:

  • punishment of offenders
  • reduction of crime (including deterrence)
  • reform and rehabilitation of offenders
  • protection of the public
  • reparation by offenders to victims

Key Term: Purposes of sentencing The statutory aims courts must consider when sentencing: punishment, deterrence, rehabilitation, public protection, and reparation.

The Step-by-Step Approach to Sentencing

Sentencing guidelines require courts to follow a structured, stepwise process. This ensures that all relevant factors are considered and that sentences are proportionate and consistent.

Step 1: Determine Offence Category

The court first assesses the seriousness of the offence by considering:

  • Culpability: the offender’s level of responsibility (e.g., intent, recklessness, negligence)
  • Harm: the impact or potential impact of the offence

Key Term: Culpability The degree of blameworthiness of the offender, based on intent, planning, and role.

Key Term: Harm The actual or potential impact of the offence on victims or society.

Step 2: Identify Starting Point and Category Range

Each guideline provides a starting point sentence and a range for each offence category. The starting point reflects a typical case; the range allows for adjustment based on case-specific factors.

Step 3: Consider Aggravating and Mitigating Factors

Aggravating factors increase the seriousness of the offence and may justify a higher sentence. Examples include:

  • previous convictions
  • offending while on bail
  • use of a weapon
  • targeting vulnerable victims

Mitigating factors reduce seriousness and may justify a lower sentence. Examples include:

  • genuine remorse
  • lack of previous convictions
  • young age or immaturity
  • evidence of rehabilitation

Key Term: Aggravating factor A circumstance that increases the seriousness of the offence and may lead to a harsher sentence.

Key Term: Mitigating factor A circumstance that reduces the seriousness of the offence and may lead to a more lenient sentence.

Step 4: Reduction for Guilty Plea

A timely guilty plea entitles the offender to a reduction in sentence, usually up to one-third if entered at the first opportunity.

Step 5: Dangerousness and Special Provisions

For certain offences or offenders, the court must consider whether special sentencing provisions apply (e.g., extended sentences for dangerous offenders).

Step 6: Totality Principle

When sentencing for multiple offences, the court must ensure the overall sentence is just and proportionate.

Step 7: Compensation and Ancillary Orders

The court considers whether to make orders for compensation, forfeiture, or other ancillary matters.

Step 8: Reasons for Sentence

The court must explain the sentence passed, including reference to the guideline followed and reasons for any departure.

Step 9: Time Spent on Remand

The court adjusts the sentence to reflect any time already spent in custody.

Judicial Discretion and Departure from Guidelines

Courts are required to follow sentencing guidelines unless it would be contrary to the interests of justice. If departing from the guideline, the court must state its reasons clearly.

Key Term: Judicial discretion The court’s power to depart from sentencing guidelines where justice requires, provided reasons are given.

Worked Example 1.1

A defendant is convicted of burglary. The guideline starting point is 12 months’ custody. The defendant has previous convictions for similar offences (aggravating factor) but also pleaded guilty at the first opportunity (mitigating factor). The court increases the sentence to 18 months for the aggravating factor, then reduces it by one-third for the guilty plea, resulting in a final sentence of 12 months’ custody.

Answer: The court followed the guideline, adjusted for aggravating and mitigating factors, and applied the reduction for a guilty plea.

The Role of Consistency and Fairness

Sentencing guidelines are designed to encourage consistency, so that similar cases receive similar sentences. However, the structured approach also ensures that individual circumstances are considered, maintaining fairness.

Worked Example 1.2

Two offenders are convicted of assault. One has no previous convictions and acted under provocation (mitigating factors). The other has a history of violence and used a weapon (aggravating factors). Both offences are in the same category, but the first receives a community order, while the second receives a custodial sentence.

Answer: The difference in sentence is justified by the presence of aggravating and mitigating factors, as directed by the guidelines.

Exam Warning

Courts must provide clear reasons for any departure from the guideline. Failure to do so may result in an appeal or sentence being quashed.

Revision Tip

Always identify the relevant guideline, offence category, and key factors before attempting an SQE1 sentencing question.

Key Point Checklist

This article has covered the following key knowledge points:

  • Sentencing guidelines have statutory authority and must be followed unless justice requires otherwise.
  • The court must assess culpability and harm to determine the offence category.
  • Aggravating and mitigating factors adjust the starting point sentence.
  • A reduction is given for a timely guilty plea.
  • The court must apply the totality principle for multiple offences.
  • Judicial discretion allows departure from guidelines, but reasons must be given.
  • Consistency and fairness are central aims of the guidelines.

Key Terms and Concepts

  • Sentencing guidelines
  • Sentencing Council
  • Purposes of sentencing
  • Culpability
  • Harm
  • Aggravating factor
  • Mitigating factor
  • Judicial discretion
The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Barbri SQE
One-time Fee
$3,800-6,900
BPP SQE
One-time Fee
$5,400-8,200
College of Legal P...
One-time Fee
$2,300-9,100
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350
Law Training Centr...
One-time Fee
$500-6,200
QLTS SQE
One-time Fee
$2,500-3,800
University of Law...
One-time Fee
$6,200-22,400

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal