Learning Outcomes
This article explores the core principles governing fiduciary relationships and the duties owed by fiduciaries. It details the consequences of breaching these duties and outlines the primary remedies available to beneficiaries, including personal and proprietary claims. For the SQE1 assessments, you will need to identify fiduciary relationships, recognise breaches of fiduciary duties, and understand the characteristics and applicability of remedies such as equitable compensation, account of profits, constructive trusts, and tracing. Your understanding will enable you to analyse factual scenarios and select the appropriate legal principles and remedies in SQE1-style single best answer questions.
SQE1 Syllabus
For SQE1, you are required to understand the nature of fiduciary obligations and the remedies available when those obligations are breached. This involves applying these principles practically to advise clients on potential claims and liabilities.
Your revision should focus on:
- The defining characteristics of a fiduciary relationship.
- The principal fiduciary duties, including loyalty, the no-conflict rule, and the no-profit rule.
- Common ways in which fiduciary duties can be breached.
- The distinction between personal and proprietary remedies for breach of fiduciary duty.
- The application of equitable compensation and account of profits.
- The imposition of constructive trusts as a remedy.
- The principles and limitations of equitable tracing.
- The potential liability of third parties (strangers) for knowing receipt or dishonest assistance.
Test Your Knowledge
Attempt these questions before reading this article. If you find some difficult or cannot remember the answers, remember to look more closely at that area during your revision.
-
Which of the following is NOT a core fiduciary duty?
- Duty of loyalty
- Duty to maximise profits at all costs
- No-conflict rule
- No-profit rule
-
A trustee uses confidential information gained during their trusteeship to make a personal profit buying shares. The trust itself could not have afforded the shares. Which remedy is most likely available to the beneficiaries?
- Damages at common law
- Equitable compensation for loss suffered by the trust
- An account of profits made by the trustee
- Rescission of the share purchase
-
What is the primary difference between a personal claim and a proprietary claim for breach of fiduciary duty?
- Personal claims are available only against trustees, while proprietary claims are available against third parties.
- Personal claims seek monetary compensation, while proprietary claims seek recovery of specific property or its substitute.
- Proprietary claims require proof of dishonesty, while personal claims do not.
- Proprietary claims are subject to a six-year limitation period, while personal claims are not.
-
Which equitable remedy allows a principal to follow misappropriated property into different forms or into the hands of third parties?
- Equitable compensation
- Account of profits
- Constructive trust
- Tracing
Introduction
A fiduciary relationship is one built on trust and confidence, where one party (the fiduciary) undertakes to act for or on behalf of another (the principal or beneficiary) in circumstances that require loyalty and good faith. Equity imposes strict duties on fiduciaries to ensure they prioritise their principal's interests above their own. Understanding these duties and the consequences of their breach is essential for legal practice, particularly in trusts, company law, and agency. This article examines the key fiduciary obligations and the remedies available when these duties are breached.
The Fiduciary Relationship
Equity recognises certain relationships as inherently fiduciary due to their nature, such as trustee-beneficiary, director-company, solicitor-client, and agent-principal. In other situations, a fiduciary relationship can arise based on the specific circumstances, where one party relies on the other's undertaking to act in their best interests.
Key Term: Fiduciary Duty An obligation imposed by equity requiring a person (the fiduciary) to act with utmost loyalty and good faith in the interests of another (the principal or beneficiary), avoiding any conflict between personal interest and duty.
The core duties underpin this relationship:
Duty of Loyalty
This is the fundamental duty requiring the fiduciary to act solely in the best interests of the principal within the scope of their relationship. The fiduciary must not allow personal interests to influence their actions regarding the principal's affairs.
No-Conflict Rule
A fiduciary must not place themselves in a position where their personal interests conflict, or potentially conflict, with their duty to the principal. This rule is strictly applied to prevent the fiduciary from being swayed by personal considerations.
No-Profit Rule
A fiduciary must not make an unauthorised profit from their position or from information or opportunities acquired through their role. Any profit made in breach of this duty belongs in equity to the principal.
Duty of Confidentiality
Fiduciaries often gain access to sensitive information belonging to their principal. They have a duty not to disclose this information or use it for their own benefit without the principal's informed consent.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty
A breach occurs if a fiduciary fails to comply with any of their duties. This can happen through a positive act (like making an unauthorised profit) or an omission (like failing to disclose a conflict of interest). Establishing a breach involves identifying the fiduciary relationship, the specific duty owed, and the failure to meet the required standard.
Common Breaches
- Self-dealing: A transaction where the fiduciary acts on behalf of both themselves and the principal without informed consent (e.g., a trustee purchasing trust property). Such transactions are typically voidable by the principal.
- Fair-dealing: A transaction where the fiduciary purchases the principal's beneficial interest. This is permissible only if the fiduciary can show full disclosure, fair price, and no abuse of position.
- Unauthorised Profits: Making profits from the fiduciary position without the principal's informed consent (e.g., accepting secret commissions or bribes).
- Competing with the Principal: Setting up a business that competes directly with the principal's business within the scope of the fiduciary relationship.
- Misuse of Information: Using confidential information or opportunities obtained through the fiduciary role for personal gain.
Third Party Liability
Strangers to the trust (third parties) can sometimes be held liable as if they were fiduciaries (constructive trustees) if they become involved in a breach. This typically occurs through:
- Knowing Receipt: Receiving trust property transferred in breach of trust with sufficient knowledge that the transfer was wrongful, making it unconscionable to retain the property.
- Dishonest Assistance: Assisting a fiduciary in a breach of trust with a dishonest state of mind (judged objectively).
Remedies for Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Where a breach of fiduciary duty causes loss to the principal or results in an unauthorised gain for the fiduciary, equity provides a range of remedies. The choice of remedy depends on the nature of the breach, the consequences, and the principal's objectives. Remedies can be personal (against the fiduciary) or proprietary (against specific property).
Personal Remedies
These remedies target the fiduciary personally, aiming to compensate the principal for loss or strip the fiduciary of gains.
Equitable Compensation
This remedy aims to restore the principal to the position they would have been in had the breach not occurred. It is similar to common law damages but is more flexible, assessed at the time of judgment, and not subject to common law rules like remoteness or contributory negligence. Causation is still required – the loss must flow directly from the breach.
Key Term: Equitable Compensation A monetary remedy awarded by equity to compensate a principal for loss suffered due to a fiduciary's breach of duty, aiming to restore the principal to their pre-breach position.
Account of Profits
This requires the fiduciary to surrender any unauthorised profits made as a result of the breach. The principal does not need to prove they suffered a loss; the focus is on preventing the fiduciary's unjust enrichment.
Key Term: Account of Profits An equitable remedy requiring a fiduciary to disclose and pay over any profits made through a breach of their duty, irrespective of whether the principal suffered a loss.
Proprietary Remedies
These remedies attach to specific property or its proceeds, allowing the principal to assert ownership rights. They are particularly valuable if the fiduciary is insolvent, as they give the principal priority over general creditors.
Constructive Trust
Equity may impose a constructive trust over property acquired by the fiduciary in breach of duty (e.g., a bribe received or an asset purchased with misappropriated funds). This means the fiduciary holds the legal title to the property on trust for the principal, who holds the beneficial interest.
Key Term: Constructive Trust A trust imposed by equity, regardless of the parties' intentions, to prevent unjust enrichment or unconscionable conduct, often used as a remedy for breach of fiduciary duty.
Equitable Lien or Charge
Where trust property has been used to acquire or improve an asset belonging to the fiduciary, the principal may be entitled to an equitable lien or charge over that asset to secure the amount owed. This gives the principal the right to have the asset sold to satisfy their claim.
Tracing
This is not a remedy itself but an evidential process that allows the principal to identify and follow their property (or its value) as it changes form or passes into the hands of others. Successful tracing enables a proprietary claim to be asserted against the identified property or its substitute.
Key Term: Tracing The equitable process of identifying property or its value as it is substituted for other property or passes into different hands, enabling a proprietary claim.
Limitations on Tracing:
- The property must be identifiable. Tracing is lost if the property is dissipated (e.g., spent on a holiday) or its value destroyed.
- Tracing cannot be asserted against a bona fide purchaser for value without notice ('equity's darling').
- It may be inequitable to trace against an innocent volunteer, particularly if they have changed their position in reliance on the receipt of the property.
Worked Example 1.1
Scenario: A company director learns of a profitable opportunity to acquire land adjacent to the company's factory during a board meeting. The company decides not to pursue the opportunity due to lack of funds. The director, without disclosing their intention to the board or obtaining consent, purchases the land personally and later sells it at a significant profit.
Question: What remedies might the company seek against the director?
Answer: The director has breached their fiduciary duty (no-conflict and no-profit rules) by exploiting an opportunity derived from their position for personal gain. The company could seek an account of profits, requiring the director to surrender the profit made from the land sale. Alternatively, if the director still owned the land, the company might seek a declaration that the director holds the land on constructive trust for the company.
Worked Example 1.2
Scenario: A trustee misappropriates £50,000 from the trust fund. They mix this with £50,000 of their own money in their personal bank account. They then use £60,000 from the account to buy shares in their own name. The remaining £40,000 is spent on living expenses. The shares are now worth £75,000.
Question: Using equitable tracing rules, what is the beneficiary's strongest proprietary claim?
Answer: The trustee has mixed trust funds with their own. Applying the rule in Re Hallett's Estate, the trustee is deemed to spend their own money first. However, applying the rule in Re Oatway, where an investment is made before dissipation, the beneficiary can claim the investment represents trust money. Here, the £60,000 shares purchase likely comprises £10,000 of the trustee's money and £50,000 of trust money. The beneficiaries can trace into the shares. As the shares have increased in value, they should claim a proportionate share (50/60ths or 5/6ths) of the current value, which is £62,500 (5/6 x £75,000). They also have a personal claim against the trustee for any shortfall.
Exam Warning
Distinguishing between personal and proprietary remedies is critical. Proprietary claims offer advantages, especially in insolvency, but depend on identifiable property. Personal claims target the fiduciary's own assets but rank alongside other creditors if the fiduciary is bankrupt. Ensure you identify the most appropriate and effective remedy based on the facts provided in the exam scenario.
Key Point Checklist
This article has covered the following key knowledge points:
- Fiduciary relationships are based on trust and confidence, imposing strict duties of loyalty.
- Core duties include the duty of loyalty, the no-conflict rule, the no-profit rule, and confidentiality.
- Breaches occur when a fiduciary fails in these duties, potentially through self-dealing, making unauthorised profits, or misusing information.
- Remedies for breach can be personal (equitable compensation, account of profits) or proprietary (constructive trust, equitable lien, tracing).
- Equitable compensation aims to restore the principal's loss, while an account of profits strips the fiduciary's gain.
- Proprietary remedies attach to specific assets and provide priority in insolvency.
- Tracing is a process to identify trust property or its substitute, enabling a proprietary claim.
- Third parties can be liable for knowing receipt or dishonest assistance in a breach of trust.
Key Terms and Concepts
- Fiduciary Duty
- Equitable Compensation
- Account of Profits
- Constructive Trust
- Tracing
