Stages of a criminal trial

Can You Answer This?

Practice with real exam questions

Martin is charged with the summary offence of common assault after an altercation with a neighbour outside a local café. The case is heard in the Magistrates' Court, where Martin pleads not guilty, and the prosecution presents multiple witness testimonies. A key witness claims that the lighting was poor at the time of the alleged assault, raising doubts about the defendant's identification. At the close of the prosecution's case, Martin's lawyer argues that the evidence is insufficient to prove Martin's guilt. The defence submits there is no case to answer and asks the magistrates to dismiss the charge.


Which of the following statements best describes the correct test for dealing with this submission?

Introduction

Trial procedure in criminal courts involves the systematic sequence of events that occur during the prosecution of a criminal case. In England and Wales, the Magistrates' Court and the Crown Court are the primary venues for criminal trials, each with distinct roles and procedures. The Magistrates' Court typically handles summary offences and some either-way offences, while the Crown Court deals with indictable-only offences and serious either-way offences. Central to these procedures are the principles of fair trial, the presumption of innocence, and the burden of proof resting on the prosecution to prove the defendant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Understanding the specific stages and legal requirements of trials in both courts is important for legal practitioners and candidates preparing for the SQE1 FLK2 exam.

Inside the Magistrates' Court: Step by Step

Picture the Magistrates' Court as the first stop for most criminal cases. It's where the journey through the justice system often begins, and here's how the process typically unfolds:

Beginning with the Charge

Once an individual is charged with an offence, the case starts in the Magistrates' Court. The prosecution presents the charges and outlines the key evidence. They might call witnesses and introduce exhibits to support their case. This stage is akin to laying all the cards on the table, showing what they have against the defendant.

The Burden of Proof and "No Case to Answer"

In the Magistrates' Court, the prosecution carries the burden of proof. They must establish the defendant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. If, after the prosecution presents its case, the evidence appears insufficient, the defense can submit that there is "no case to answer." This means they believe the prosecution hasn't provided enough evidence to require a response. It's like saying, "Based on what's been presented, there's nothing here that proves I did anything wrong."

The Defense's Turn

If the court doesn't accept the "no case to answer" submission, the defense then has the opportunity to present its case. They might bring forward witnesses, challenge the prosecution's evidence, and provide their own exhibits. It's their chance to tell their side of the story and cast doubt on the prosecution's claims.

Reaching a Verdict

After both sides have presented their cases, the magistrates—or sometimes a district judge—consider all the evidence. They deliberate and then deliver a verdict: guilty or not guilty. It's a decisive moment that determines the immediate future of the defendant.

Stepping into the Crown Court: The Jury Takes Center Stage

For more serious offences, the trial moves to the Crown Court, where the stakes are higher, and the procedures more detailed.

Jury Selection: Finding Impartial Decision-Makers

A defining feature of the Crown Court is the jury. Twelve ordinary people are selected to listen to the case and decide on the facts. It's like assembling a cross-section of the community to ensure fairness in the decision-making process. The selection aims to exclude bias, ensuring that the verdict is based solely on the evidence presented.

The Trial Unfolds: Prosecution and Defense

The prosecution presents its case first, just as in the Magistrates' Court, but often in greater detail due to the seriousness of the offences. The defense then has the chance to cross-examine witnesses and present their own evidence. The back-and-forth can be quite dynamic, much like a strategic game where each side anticipates the other's moves.

The Judge's Role: Guiding the Process

The judge in the Crown Court ensures the trial runs smoothly and that the law is correctly applied. They provide guidance to the jury on legal matters but do not decide on guilt—that's the jury's job. The judge also rules on legal issues that arise during the trial, such as the admissibility of certain pieces of evidence.

Jury Deliberation and Verdict

After all the evidence and closing arguments, the judge sums up the case and directs the jury on the relevant law. The jury then retires to deliberate in private. They must try to reach a unanimous verdict, though under certain conditions, a majority verdict can be accepted. This deliberation is an essential phase, as the jurors weigh the evidence and the credibility of witnesses to reach their decision.

Comparing Magistrates' and Crown Court Procedures

Understanding the differences between these courts is important. Here's a quick comparison to highlight the key aspects:

AspectMagistrates' CourtCrown Court
Offences TriedSummary and some either-way offencesIndictable-only and serious either-way offences
Decision-MakersMagistrates or District JudgeJury (verdict) and Judge (legal guidance and sentencing)
Maximum SentencingLimited (e.g., 6 months imprisonment)More severe penalties, up to life imprisonment
Presence of JuryNoYes
Complexity and LengthGenerally shorter and simplerLonger trials with more detailed procedures

Bringing It to Life: Real-World Examples

Sometimes it's easier to understand these concepts with a story.

John's Day in Magistrates' Court

Consider John, who is charged with possession of a small amount of a controlled drug. His case is heard in the Magistrates' Court. After the prosecution presents its evidence—the testimony of the police officer and the lab report confirming the substance—the defense argues that the search was unlawful. They submit there's "no case to answer" because the evidence was improperly obtained. The magistrates consider this argument. If they agree, the case may be dismissed. If not, the trial proceeds, and John’s lawyer presents his defense. After deliberation, the magistrates reach a verdict based on the evidence and legal arguments.

Mary's Trial in the Crown Court

Now consider Mary, charged with a serious assault causing grievous bodily harm. Her case goes to the Crown Court due to the severity of the offence. A jury is selected, and over several days, both the prosecution and defense present detailed evidence, including medical reports and expert witnesses. The judge guides the process, ensuring both sides follow the rules and that the jury understands the legal principles. After closing arguments, the judge gives the jury legal directions, and they retire to decide Mary's fate. The verdict must be based on whether the prosecution has satisfied the burden of proof.

Understanding the Participants

It's important to know who does what in these trials.

  • Judge: Ensures the law is correctly applied and trials are fair. In the Crown Court, the judge also sentences convicted defendants, following guidelines and considering factors like aggravating or mitigating circumstances.
  • Magistrates: In the Magistrates' Court, these are either laypeople or a district judge who decide on guilt and sentencing. They rely on legal advisers for guidance on the law.
  • Prosecutor: Represents the state, presenting evidence to prove the defendant's guilt. They must disclose all relevant evidence, even if it assists the defense.
  • Defense Counsel: Represents the defendant, challenging the prosecution's case and presenting evidence on the defendant's behalf. They protect the defendant's rights and ensure a fair trial.
  • Jury: In the Crown Court, the jury listens to the evidence and decides whether the defendant is guilty or not. They are the sole judges of fact.

Conclusion

The involvement of the jury in the Crown Court represents a significant distinction in criminal trial procedures. This complexity is evident when considering the interaction between the jury's fact-finding role and the judge's responsibility to manage the trial and provide legal direction. The principle established in R v Woolmington [1935] AC 462 reinforces that the burden of proof lies with the prosecution, a concept that is fundamental to both courts but manifests differently due to procedural variations.

The submission of "no case to answer" demonstrates the interaction between evidence sufficiency and legal standards. As outlined in R v Galbraith [1981] 1 WLR 1039, this submission allows the defense to argue that the prosecution's evidence, even at its highest, cannot lead to a conviction. This mechanism operates in both courts but carries unique implications in the context of jury trials, where clarity in legal directions is essential.

Procedural rules, such as those found in the Criminal Procedure Rules 2020, govern the conduct of trials and ensure fairness. The Magistrates' Courts Act 1980 and the Courts Act 2003 provide statutory frameworks that delineate the jurisdiction and powers of the respective courts. Understanding these legal instruments and how they interact with case law is essential for following the stages of a criminal trial.

Simply put, the stages of a criminal trial—from charge presentation to verdict—require meticulous adherence to legal principles and procedures. The roles of the participants, the burden of proof, and the rights of the defendant intertwine to uphold the integrity of the justice system. For SQE1 FLK2 candidates, a thorough comprehension of these processes, supported by statutory references and case law, is indispensable in fully understanding the practical application of criminal law.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Barbri SQE
One-time Fee
$3,800-6,900
BPP SQE
One-time Fee
$5,400-8,200
College of Legal P...
One-time Fee
$2,300-9,100
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350
Law Training Centr...
One-time Fee
$500-6,200
QLTS SQE
One-time Fee
$2,500-3,800
University of Law...
One-time Fee
$6,200-22,400

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of December 2024. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

Practice. Learn. Excel.

Features designed to support your job and test preparation

Question Bank

Access 100,000+ questions that adapt to your performance level and learning style.

Performance Analytics

Track your progress across topics and identify knowledge gaps with comprehensive analytics and insights.

Multi-Assessment Support

Prepare for multiple exams simultaneously, from academic tests to professional certifications.

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal