Welcome

Tennant v Smith [1892] AC 150

ResourcesTennant v Smith [1892] AC 150

Facts

  • Mr. Smith was employed by a bank and provided with free housing as part of his employment.
  • Occupation of the residence was required for Mr. Smith's effective performance of his job.
  • He was not permitted to let others live in the property or derive additional income from it.
  • Tax authorities asserted that the value of the housing should be included in Mr. Smith's taxable income.
  • The dispute over this tax assessment was brought before the courts and ultimately reached the House of Lords.

Issues

  1. Whether the free housing provided to Mr. Smith by his employer constituted taxable income.
  2. Whether a non-monetary employment perk, such as employer-provided housing, should be taxed if it cannot be converted into cash.

Decision

  • The House of Lords held that the free housing provided to Mr. Smith was not taxable income.
  • The decision turned on the fact that Mr. Smith could not convert the housing benefit into cash or obtain financial gain beyond its use.
  • The court distinguished between perks that could be turned into cash and those that merely reduced personal living expenses, determining that only the former are taxable as income.
  • The case established the convertibility test as the primary method for determining if a non-monetary employment perk is taxable: only perks that can be converted into cash are considered taxable income.
  • Non-monetary perks that solely satisfy personal needs, and cannot be transferred or monetized, fall outside the scope of taxable income.
  • Later cases, such as Reed v Seymour [1927] 11 TC 625 and Heaton v Bell [1970] AC 728, further clarified the importance of convertibility, considering whether an employee could choose between a perk or cash, or if any restrictions existed on transferring or selling the benefit.

Conclusion

Tennant v Smith [1892] AC 150 remains a leading authority on the taxation of non-monetary employment perks, establishing the convertibility principle as central to distinguishing between taxable and non-taxable benefits, a rule that continues to influence tax law on work income.

Assistant

How can I help you?
Expliquer en français
Explicar en español
Объяснить на русском
شرح بالعربية
用中文解释
हिंदी में समझाएं
Give me a quick summary
Break this down step by step
What are the key points?
Study companion mode
Homework helper mode
Loyal friend mode
Academic mentor mode
Expliquer en français
Explicar en español
Объяснить на русском
شرح بالعربية
用中文解释
हिंदी में समझाएं
Give me a quick summary
Break this down step by step
What are the key points?
Study companion mode
Homework helper mode
Loyal friend mode
Academic mentor mode

Responses can be incorrect. Please double check.