Williams v Bermuda Hospital [2016] UKPC 4

Facts

  • Mrs. Williams underwent surgery at Bermuda Hospital for fibroid removal.
  • During the procedure, she suffered a cardiac arrest resulting in severe brain damage.
  • Mrs. Williams alleged that the hospital and its staff negligently failed to adequately monitor her oxygen levels and respond promptly to her deteriorating condition.
  • At trial, the court found the hospital breached its duty by failing to provide adequate monitoring and timely intervention.
  • Causation was complicated by Mrs. Williams' pre-existing medical conditions and the ordinary risks of surgery.
  • The trial court applied the material contribution approach, determining the hospital’s negligence was a significant factor in the injury.
  • The hospital appealed, leading to review by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (UKPC).

Issues

  1. Whether the hospital’s negligence materially contributed to Mrs. Williams’ injury despite the presence of other risk factors and pre-existing conditions.
  2. Whether the material contribution doctrine could be applied in this medical negligence context to establish causation.
  3. What evidentiary standards govern the proof of causation in clinical negligence where multiple contributing factors exist.

Decision

  • The UKPC held that the material contribution doctrine applied to the case.
  • It was determined that it was not necessary for Mrs. Williams to prove the hospital’s negligence was the sole cause of her injury.
  • The court found that the hospital's breach of duty was a substantial, significant contributing factor to the harm suffered.
  • The existence of other factors (such as pre-existing conditions and risks of surgery) did not remove the hospital’s liability.
  • The appeal by the hospital was rejected, upholding the trial court’s determination of liability based on material contribution.

Legal Principles

  • The material contribution doctrine allows claimants to establish causation where a defendant’s negligence made a significant contribution to the harm, even if other factors are present.
  • It is not required to show that negligence was the sole cause; sufficient contribution to the risk or injury can establish liability.
  • Courts rely heavily on expert evidence to assess standard of care and causality in medical negligence claims.
  • Defendants can be liable if their breach materially increases the risk of harm, notwithstanding the presence of concurrent causes.
  • The principles align with those established in other common law jurisdictions.

Conclusion

The UKPC confirmed that in complex medical negligence cases with multiple contributing factors, a defendant may be held liable if their negligence materially contributes to the harm. The material contribution doctrine remains a central principle for establishing causation where uncertainty exists about the sole cause of injury.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal