Wood v Rowcliffe (1847) 2 Ph 383

Facts

  • The case concerned a contractual dispute involving the sale of a specific piece of land.
  • The plaintiff, Wood, claimed that Rowcliffe breached their contract by failing to transfer the land as agreed.
  • Wood sought specific restitution, arguing the land was unique and monetary damages would be inadequate compensation.
  • Rowcliffe contended that damages were sufficient since the land could be valued and compensated financially.
  • The court found the property’s unique characteristics justified specific restitution to the plaintiff.

Issues

  1. Whether specific restitution is an appropriate remedy when the subject matter of the dispute is unique and monetary damages would be inadequate.
  2. Whether the court should exercise its discretion to order restitution of the land to Wood, rather than awarding damages.

Decision

  • The Chancery Court ordered specific restitution in favour of Wood, holding that damages would not provide a complete remedy.
  • Lord Chancellor Cottenham determined the unique nature of the land warranted its return to the plaintiff.
  • The judgment confirmed specific restitution is appropriate where property is irreplaceable or of particular significance.

Legal Principles

  • Specific restitution is an equitable remedy compelling the return of a particular asset, rather than monetary compensation.
  • This remedy is especially suitable when the subject matter is unique or irreplaceable, such as specific land or heirlooms.
  • The court’s discretion to grant specific restitution is guided by factors including the property's nature, adequacy of damages, and parties’ conduct.
  • Equity aims to restore parties to their rightful positions, applying the maxim that equity regards as done what ought to be done.
  • Where legal remedies are inadequate, equitable remedies such as specific restitution and performance are available to ensure justice.

Conclusion

Wood v Rowcliffe establishes that the court may order specific restitution instead of damages when the disputed property is unique or irreplaceable, reaffirming the principle that equitable remedies serve to restore the status quo where monetary compensation would be insufficient.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal