Welcome

Zim Properties Ltd v Procter [1985] STC 90

ResourcesZim Properties Ltd v Procter [1985] STC 90

Facts

  • Zim Properties Ltd acquired shares in a company that might have possessed a legal claim against its auditors for negligence.
  • The company subsequently sold the shares, including the associated right to pursue legal action, to another party.
  • Tax authorities contended that the right to sue constituted a separate asset, and its disposal led to a taxable gain under capital gains tax (CGT).

Issues

  1. Whether the right to sue for negligence could be regarded as a separate, taxable asset for capital gains tax purposes.
  2. Whether a legal claim, when transferred together with property, is distinct from property-tied rights for the purposes of CGT.
  3. How to distinguish between standalone legal claims and those connected to property in the context of CGT.

Decision

  • The High Court held that the right to sue for negligence was not a distinct asset separate from the shares and thus not separately chargeable to tax under CGT.
  • The court distinguished between personal legal claims (which are not transferable or taxable as assets) and claims tied to property, finding the former fall outside CGT.
  • The sale of shares and the right to sue, considered together, was treated as a single transaction for capital gains tax purposes, not as separate disposals.
  • Not all legal rights qualify as taxable assets for capital gains tax purposes; for a legal right to be a taxable asset, it must exist independently of other property.
  • Standalone rights to sue, which are unconnected to property, are not taxable assets for CGT purposes.
  • Legal rights attached to or arising from property (e.g., rights to recover debts) may be transferred and can give rise to CGT liability upon disposal.
  • When a legal right is incidental to the transfer of an asset, it forms part of the asset sale for CGT assessment.
  • The origin and nature of the right must be examined to determine its tax treatment on transfer.

Conclusion

The court in Zim Properties Ltd v Procter confirmed that a right to sue constitutes a taxable asset for capital gains tax only when it is connected to property being transferred; standalone legal claims remain outside the scope of CGT, a principle impacting subsequent asset transfers involving legal rights.

Assistant

How can I help you?
Expliquer en français
Explicar en español
Объяснить на русском
شرح بالعربية
用中文解释
हिंदी में समझाएं
Give me a quick summary
Break this down step by step
What are the key points?
Study companion mode
Homework helper mode
Loyal friend mode
Academic mentor mode
Expliquer en français
Explicar en español
Объяснить на русском
شرح بالعربية
用中文解释
हिंदी में समझाएं
Give me a quick summary
Break this down step by step
What are the key points?
Study companion mode
Homework helper mode
Loyal friend mode
Academic mentor mode

Responses can be incorrect. Please double check.